Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Not '100 Percent' On Muslim Ban
The Hill ^ | 1/13/2016 | Mark Hensch

Posted on 01/13/2016 11:53:50 AM PST by conservativejoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: central_va

But as is the case with so many other issues where he was siding with the far-left until running for president, immigration is no different. His first intuition in September, when the refugee crisis flared up, was to say that we had a humanitarian obligation to bring in Syrian refugees. Then when he discovered that conservatives were so ardently opposed to it, he immediately did a 180 and categorically opposed it in his typical attention-grabbing fashion. At that point there was no turning around, and because the media was attacking his new position from the Left, everyone forgot (or never noticed) his first intuition.


41 posted on 01/13/2016 1:55:03 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Now we know who the one person on Free Republic is who craps on Reagan to prop up Trump.


42 posted on 01/13/2016 1:58:38 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GrouchoTex

Ask for 100, settle for 90. That’s how you deal. But in this case I would prefer to see him not settle for less because our security is at stake. Governor Abbott backed down on this too.


43 posted on 01/13/2016 2:35:11 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

You should change your screenname....because obviously you don’t because you’re supporting, or at least defending, one.


44 posted on 01/13/2016 4:13:05 PM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
You should change your screenname....because obviously you don’t because you’re supporting, or at least defending, one.

Funny, I was just thinking you should change your screenname to Backstabber.

45 posted on 01/13/2016 4:22:10 PM PST by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

I have no idea what you mean. I don’t backstab conservatives, I support them. You? Maybe not so much, huh? Because if you’re supporting trump, you’re sure as hell not supporting a conservative.


46 posted on 01/13/2016 5:57:37 PM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
I don’t backstab conservatives

The hell you don't. You're trying to foist an unelectable candidate to peel off support for THE most electable conservative candidate in one hundred years.

Ridiculous?

Then give me a non-conspiracy-theory explanation for why he changed to when he decided to run.

47 posted on 01/13/2016 6:15:53 PM PST by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Give me some proof the braying jackass is a conservative! What has ever DONE (not just clapped his gums about) in his entire ridiculous life that shows he has a sincerely held conservative belief?

As another FReeper asked: So where are Trump’s SuperPACs promoting conservative, or even Republican, causes? Where are his Americans first policies within his companies? Where’s his assertion that all of his companies will henceforth use e-verify? Why did he feel it necessary to use foreign labor in his hotels and casinos? Where’s his “Trump Foundation for Veterans”?

They are all as existent as his character and morals were when he was screwing around on the TWO mothers of his children.


48 posted on 01/13/2016 6:42:59 PM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
Give me some proof the braying jackass is a conservative! What has ever DONE (not just clapped his gums about) in his entire ridiculous life that shows he has a sincerely held conservative belief?

Good God, man! Open your eyes! Flapping his gums as a candidate IS doing something as a Conservative!

49 posted on 01/13/2016 7:33:41 PM PST by papertyger (-/\/\/\-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Cruz IS married to a Globalist/Bankster/Government-Class/WTO/CFR member in the famous revolving door between Goldman Sacks and the Federal Gov/Federal Reserve. She was right in the thick of it in 2008. (If any of you remember 2008)


50 posted on 01/13/2016 7:43:11 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger

Talking about charlatans I bet you voted for Romney


51 posted on 01/13/2016 7:46:13 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gg188

Thanks for chiming in from Occupy Wall Street.


52 posted on 01/13/2016 7:55:04 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

It boils down to: who are you going to believe?

1. PROVEN liars, who have proven they are liars time after time, or 2. Someone who has not been proven yet to be a liar.

In 2012 the Repubs said, oh, if you give us the Senate, we will:
*Repeal Obamacare
*Secure the border
*Deport illegals
*Reduce spending
*Reduce deficit
etc etc.

They-—including Cruz-—did none of those things. They LIED.

Did some “try”, like Cruz? Yes, I’m sure. But in the REAL world, in business, you get the job done or you don’t.

I worked in corporations for years. If the Senior Vice President of Widgets didn’t get the widgets produced, didn’t get his “nut”, or goal or quota, he was gone. The economy was bad? Winter was bad? The Widget biz was off? Sorry. He still was gone, AND his management team. Gone.

When a football team fires its head coach for losing, the assistant coaches go too in almost every case, rarely are one or two kept. Unfair? Yes. But we hired you to WIN. You didn’t.

I was assigned a project. It didn’t work out because I couldn’t schmooze or motivate or threaten someone into completing a key task in the project. When my review came, my boss said I FAILED. I said, but so-and-so wouldn’t do what was necessary for me to succeed! My boss said, well, maybe somebody else COULD have got that person to do it. And he was exactly right.

So-—you can believe known, proven, world-class, in-your-face liars like Reince Preibus, McConnell, Ryan, and all of them, OR you can give the guy a try who has a great game and hasn’t yet had a chance to betray you or lie to you.

Which is it? Proven liar who we KNOW will not do what he says, or very possibly a man who will do what he says he’ll do.

The entire GOP congressional delegation failed. I say kick them all out.


53 posted on 01/13/2016 7:56:37 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gg188

Ahhh...but your boy has betrayed the most important trust there is: he cheated on the mother of his children. And he thought it was so awesome, he then did it again! A man who betrays THAT trust is beyond despicable.


54 posted on 01/14/2016 3:31:50 AM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gg188

And additionally, Cruz is but one of a hundred. And he was the only one who DID what he SAID he would. He did everything in his 1/100th power to stop those things that you cited. You can fault him, erroneously, for failing but you cannot say he lied. He was the only one who followed through on his campaign promises. And to now cite that as a reason to not vote for him is exactly why conservatives find themselves in the state we do. Circular firing squad much?


55 posted on 01/14/2016 4:12:24 AM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Aw, hell! I was hoping he’d make the ban retroactive, but apparently it is radioactive. Trump might have been our final hope to reverse the tide.


56 posted on 01/14/2016 2:40:07 PM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson