To: Crazieman
Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to.
Now, the judges authorizing it...that is a different story.
Make them worry.
A lot.
To: Da Coyote
I do attack cops that were “Just carrying out orders.”
Stop protecting the ones without conscience.
14 posted on
12/30/2015 7:07:43 AM PST by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: Da Coyote
I Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to.
BS ... any cop carrying out this unconstitutional law is also responsible ...
15 posted on
12/30/2015 7:09:27 AM PST by
clamper1797
(Repeat after me ... there is no such thing as a "moderate" muslim)
To: Da Coyote
Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to.They can't resign? Guess we shouldn't have blamed the SS either then? After all they were just helpless victims carrying out orders.
16 posted on
12/30/2015 7:10:45 AM PST by
Kudsman
(Restore the Republic, repeal the 17th.)
To: Da Coyote
A police officer needs to know when to say to his bosses:
"...This is both unconstitutional and wrong. I won't do it..."
17 posted on
12/30/2015 7:11:02 AM PST by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Da Coyote
Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to.I'm not a German speaker but I think it's "Befehl ist Befehl".
18 posted on
12/30/2015 7:11:19 AM PST by
Stentor
(Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, were victims of sex crimes not infidelity.)
To: Da Coyote
They can quit, and live out the rest of their lives with their conscience clear.
38 posted on
12/30/2015 7:59:05 AM PST by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
To: Da Coyote
What? If I was a cop, I would not follow unlawful commands. The excuse of I was just following orders doesn’t fly. How about these cops don’t carry this out, or quit. I agree judges should be held accountable, but I can’t excuse the foot soldiers.
39 posted on
12/30/2015 8:02:35 AM PST by
Bulwyf
To: Da Coyote
Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to. 'Following orders' is not a defense. EVER.
44 posted on
12/30/2015 8:17:31 AM PST by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: Da Coyote
"Don’t attack the cops carrying this out...they are forced to." I'll attack anybody coming to take away my Constitutionally granted rights. You don't debate rights, you exercise them. And you do whatever is necessary to those who would deny you those rights.
You can go after the judges.
47 posted on
12/30/2015 8:23:09 AM PST by
Comment Not Approved
(When bureaucrats outlaw hunting, outlaws will hunt bureaucrats.)
To: Da Coyote
Now, the judges authorizing it...that is a different story.Agreed. Primary targets should ALWAYS be THOSE GIVING THE ORDERS.
60 posted on
12/30/2015 9:26:47 AM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: Da Coyote
No, they ARE NOT forced.
“Just following orders” was rejected as an excuse.
But, they will act and violate rights, and the consequences may fall. They will be deserving.
62 posted on
12/30/2015 9:42:16 AM PST by
RoadGumby
(This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
To: Da Coyote
I like you, but you’re wrong on this one.
To: Da Coyote
lots of cops enjoy it. plus when they go into your house, dont think they wont be looking for anything else they can string you up on. this is a pretext to go on a fishing expedition without any evidence except heresay from an unknown to you other party.
73 posted on
12/30/2015 12:25:30 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson