No, one of those was a drop quote from the article. I cut-and-pasted the code of the article from the HTML of the site. Dilger did not over use the word. If you had bothered to go to the original article site, you would have seen that. But you prefer to always go for the cheap, ad hominem shot, every time. You have no discrimination, Baron. You do no research.
The word Crushed used three times up as you posted....not sure what you are gettin at.