Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker; SunkenCiv; onedoug; JimSEA
from the article: "Carlo Rovelli, a proponent of loop quantum gravity (string theory's rival) who is based at Aix-Marseille University in France, objected that Bayesian confirmation theory does not allow for an important distinction that exists in science between theories that scientists are certain about and those that are still being tested."

"Strong confirmation" implies numerous observations predicted by a hypothesis.
Strong confirmation converts a hypothesis into a theory.

"Weak confirmation" implies only occasional or tangential observations predicted by a hypothesis.
Weak confirmations should not be classified as adequate grounds for graduation from hypothesis to theory.

IOW, "String theory" is really just "string hypothesis".

24 posted on 12/21/2015 3:52:58 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

But that at lower energies the same mathematics exactly describe general relativity. Thus from that perspective, it’s a pretty good theory.


25 posted on 12/21/2015 7:22:38 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK
Thanks BroJoeK.

27 posted on 12/21/2015 12:44:55 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson