Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: poinq

it takes a 747 to handle the very heavy equipment required to fire an ABM laser ...


30 posted on 12/15/2015 11:05:27 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Patton@Bastogne
it takes a 747 to handle the very heavy equipment required to fire an ABM laser ...

And it needs to hold the beam on the target for a good spell to work, something the laser "enthusiasts" on FR always ignore.

I get weary of this idea they seem to have that it is one zap and all is done. The beam needs to cook things, it is not a disintegrator.

40 posted on 12/15/2015 11:20:39 AM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Our YAL-1A (Airborne Laser) was flying at 40,000 ft firing a megawatt laser at “tens of kilometers” (50) from boost-phase ICBMs circa 2010-2011.

Different from the DANG, a new USA drone (UCAV) uses an electric laser while flying at 65,000 ft firing the same power level at potentially “hundreds of kilometers” away for survivability against air defenses.

A “low-power demonstrator” of the above is planned to fly circa 2021.


42 posted on 12/15/2015 11:30:56 AM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

The requirements for ABM and a fighter are dramatically different.


64 posted on 12/15/2015 2:22:37 PM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson