[wideawake]

Don’t worry - you’ll soon get some explanations of why ethanol schemes are really conservative and patriotic, and how only RINOs and the GOPe would ever oppose envirowelfare.

[optiguy]

Already happening on a previous thread about this. One FReeper suggested they’re a good thing because it creates jobs. I guess Solendra just needed to receive more subsidies.

[American Constitutionalist]

Don’t forget about how a new government welfare program to help collage students pay off their tuition is some how conservative.

How reopening NSA’s bulk data collection and their abuses is conservative.

Trowing Israel and BiBi under the bus is some how conservative because BiBi criticized Trump.

[SoFloFreeper]

I am not anti-Trump but I also agree with Cruz that ethanol subsidies are bad.

Where do you classify me? :-)

[Republican Wildcat]

Don’t worry - you’ll soon get some explanations of why ethanol schemes are really conservative and patriotic, and how only RINOs and the GOPe would ever oppose envirowelfare.

The list on this sort of thing is endless - after Trump says something a huge number of them come along and support it lock, stock and barrel - something they disagreed with 5 seconds before he uttered the words.

[LS]

No, you'll soon get polls showing that the Cruz "surge" has dissipated (as it already has in some of the national polls).

Fact is, if you're worried about whether ethanol subsidies are an issue vs. Muslim immigration, wide open borders, TPP (which Ted voted for), Iran nukes (which Ted voted for), then your "conservative" priorities belong with the Democrats.