Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

That would take a degree in Theology, of which I do not have. How did the Mormons rectify the polygamy issue and separate that from Mormonism. Is it that Brigham Young decided that that no longer was a revelation?


6 posted on 12/02/2015 11:39:52 PM PST by abigkahuna (Here now and whatever....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: abigkahuna

I don’t think it takes a degree in theology. Mohammed was held up as the ultimate archetype of what a muslim should be. As one would expect from the founder of any religion. He was a murderer, a terrorist, a thief, a rapist and a pedophile. How can any muslim condemn those behaviors without condemning their holy prophet? Never mind condemning them they are supposed to emulate Mohammed’s behavior.


10 posted on 12/02/2015 11:45:31 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

>>That would take a degree in Theology, of which I do not have. How did the Mormons rectify the polygamy issue and separate that from Mormonism. Is it that Brigham Young decided that that no longer was a revelation?

Simple. The government made THEM find a way.

But, a very large percentage of Americans still recite the Liberal Shaheed every time that mention Islam: “Islam is a religion of peace, and those who practice terror are not real Muslims.” That statement is our national surrender to these 7th century bandits. From GWB on 9/12 on, this has been our call to surrender.


22 posted on 12/03/2015 3:26:00 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; kinsman redeemer; BlueDragon; metmom; boatbums; ...
That would take a degree in Theology, of which I do not have. How did the Mormons rectify the polygamy issue and separate that from Mormonism. Is it that Brigham Young decided that that no longer was a revelation?

I believe it is only on hold, not abrogated. Like Muhammad, Smith's visions accommodated his desires, then like the so-called "vision" that changed the law excluding blacks from the Aaronic (unScriptural in the NT) priesthood, then they can come with ways of changing even everlasting covenants.

When man is the supreme autocratic authority then the past only means what they define it as being. They is why Mormonism or any such faith is dangerous to both soul and body. As it can redefine itself and reinvent itself, it can always revert back to a more dangerous form.

And yet this is what the official state "religion" of secularism has become.

36 posted on 12/03/2015 5:35:05 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna
Is it that Brigham Young decided that that no longer was a revelation?

Not hardly!

39 posted on 12/03/2015 6:14:51 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson