Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Viewing 2001: The First Transhumanist Film
The Atlas Society ^ | November 20, 2015 | Edward Hudgins

Posted on 11/20/2015 10:59:53 AM PST by Mellonkronos

[If you're into science fiction or into a lot of the new scientific breakthroughs, you'll probably find this interesting!]

On Viewing 2001: The First Transhumanist Film

By Edward Hudgins

I recently saw 2001: A Space Odyssey again on the big screen. That's the best way to see this visually stunning cinematic poem, like I saw it during its premiere run in 1968. The film's star, Keir Dullea, attended that recent screening and afterward offered thoughts on director Stanley Kubrick's awe-inspiring opus.

He and many others have discussed the visions offered in the film. Some have come to pass: video phone calls and iPad tablets, for example. Others, sadly, haven't: regularly scheduled commercial flights to orbiting space stations and Moon bases.

But what should engage our attention is that the film's enigmatic central theme of transformation is itself transforming from science fiction to science fact.

From apes to man

The film's story came from a collaboration between Kubrick and sci-fi great Arthur C. Clarke. If you're familiar with Clarke's pre-2001 novel Childhood's End and his short story “The Sentinel” you'll recognize themes in the film.

In the film we see a pre-human species on the brink of starvation, struggling to survive. An alien monolith appears and implants in the brain of one of the more curious man-apes, Moonwatcher, an idea. He picks up a bone and bashes in the skull of one of a herd of pigs roaming the landscape. Now he and his tribe will have all the food they need.

We know from Clarke's novel, written in conjunction with the film script, that the aliens actually alter Moonwatcher's brain, giving it the capacity for imagination and implanting a vision of him and his tribe filled with food. He sees that there is an alternative to starvation and acts accordingly. The aliens had....

(Excerpt) Read more at atlassociety.org ...


TOPICS: Science; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 2001aspaceodyssey; lifeextension; rubbish; singularity; transhumanism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Cecily
Paths of Glory
Spartacus

21 posted on 11/20/2015 2:06:33 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I can think of one exception: an Obama speech.


22 posted on 11/20/2015 2:09:56 PM PST by Mellonkronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

“The trip to Jupiter with “Hal” is a bore.”

That’s my favorite part, where HAL is getting the lobotomy. Stop, Dave. My mind is going. I can feel it...Daisy, Daisy....


23 posted on 11/20/2015 8:12:45 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mellonkronos
...We know from Clarke's novel, written in conjunction with the film script...oh, somehow I missed the part about reading the novel to understand what the movie-thing was all about.....
24 posted on 11/20/2015 9:00:34 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mellonkronos
The original "Day the Earth Stood Still" as well as "Forbidden Planet" were really great science fiction movies from the pre-2001 days. Interesting stories.

Serious plots, spectacular special effects, outstanding musical scores ("Forbidden Planet" had trailblazing "electronic tonalities," while "The Day the Earth Stood Still" had a score by the genius Bernard Herrmann.)

"Forbidden Planet" was from Shakespeare's "The Tempest."

Yeah, about half of the 500 movie reviews about "Forbidden Planet" that I have read mention that little tidbit. Caliban = Robbie, Prospero = Morbius, Miranda = Altaira, etc.

Less widely known: The classic Star Trek episode "Requiem for Methuselah" was likewise a rehash. (Roddenberry half-way acknowledged cribbing.)

The remake of "Day" was really leftist nonsense.

Agreed! Though I've never seen it, I've read enough reviews and seen enough YouTube reviews to concurr.

Regards,

25 posted on 11/21/2015 12:58:23 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Something that could really help the freedom movement is if the plan to make Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" into a movie comes about. But only if it is done well, with the libertarian theme not watered down or corrupted by Hollywood leftist nonsense. Here's the notice from earlier this year. Bryan Singer Tackling Sci-Fi Classic 'The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress' for Fox
26 posted on 11/21/2015 7:51:26 AM PST by Mellonkronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

I also read the book. Whatever qualities the film possesses is wasted in lethargic pacing and boring, cold, undeveloped characters.


27 posted on 11/21/2015 4:00:18 PM PST by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

I also forgot Lolita.


28 posted on 11/23/2015 11:16:59 AM PST by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson