Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charlie Daniels Just Issued A BRUTAL Open Letter To Congress… ‘You’ve Betrayed Your Country’
AFF ^ | August 25, 2015 | Charlie Daniels

Posted on 11/04/2015 2:11:47 PM PST by Marie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last
To: stephenjohnbanker

I see a couple people on a conservative site making excuses for a hard leftist 3 full years after the GOP tanked an election to keep a communist in power.

I see a couple people so committed to justifying their failure that they flatly refuse to address, much less refute one factual point anyone on this thread, including Charlie daniels in the original article made.

I see massive attempts to get freepers to continue the mistakes that got us to today.

I see why some people withdraw from society and become Hikkimori.

I see that before the election we are going to have a total repeat of 12.

And I see that people deserve the people they vote F O R.


121 posted on 11/05/2015 9:41:56 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Your “facts” as you create them.

No more complaining about Obama from you. You helped elect him.


122 posted on 11/05/2015 9:42:10 AM PST by Calpublican (Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

Blah blah blah...


123 posted on 11/05/2015 9:43:30 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

“I see that before the election we are going to have a total repeat of 12.”

The overtures have already been made.

I find it noteworthy that Romney’s new Butt Buddy is David Axelrod. Is someone who befriends a known, proven traitor not a traitor himself? I say yes he is. But I’m so....so Paleo-conservative, and all......


124 posted on 11/05/2015 9:48:42 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Yet another thing that shows what 3 year defender types truly are.

Existential Cage Theory starts at ‘home’.


125 posted on 11/05/2015 9:56:46 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; diamond6

I just realized I wrote in the wrong “real conservative” candidate in the last presidential election. I should have written in the “real conservative”, “Norm Lenhart”. I wouldn’t have known this had not diamond pointed out to me what a swell real conservative Norm Lenhart is.

I am now practicing writing “Norm Lenhart” in case a non-real conservative becomes the final candidate. N-o-r-m L-e-n-h-a-r-t. Go Lenhart!


126 posted on 11/05/2015 12:22:57 PM PST by Marcella (CRUZ (Prepping can save your life today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

If elected my first action will be caging leftists under letters of National Security. And I will start with the leftists here since they, more than any, have done more to sabotage righting the ship of state than any I know of.

CANCERvatives kill from within, just like their namesake.


127 posted on 11/05/2015 12:26:18 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican; EternalVigilance; Norm Lenhart; Finny; RitaOK; fieldmarshaldj; Diogenes; ...
CalRepublican:

Thanks from MY country (that would be the traditional country known as the USA) and what was once my party (the GOP which has degenerated now into nothing but the political arm of the US Chamber of Cronyism and social revolution: See Romney, Mitt, Ryano, Paul, etc.) to you for being the stubborn airhead that you are and supporting the further destruction of the USA by people like Romney who impersonate Republicans on the ballot and have the nerve to call himself a "severe conservative" whatever that may mean coming out of his ever lying mouth. That is YOUR candidate and that is what YOU VOTED FOR! No amount of weaseling about him not being your first choice can dissolve your guilt. Don't waste your breath bothering to continue the pose.

Your surrender monkey tactics have destroyed California and ITS GOP but you are not satisfied and want the nation and the good conservatives of the actual Republican Party. What makes you think that conservatives or any patriots owe you or Romney or McCain or McConnell or Boehner or Ryano or McCarthy or Bush the Elder or Ford or Nixon their precious vote? Or that they must surrender their morality and integrity so that you may wallow in your "misery makes company" mode. As my late mother and late grandmother used to say: Show me your friends and I'll tell you what you are. Eternal Vigilance is my friend and Romney is yours. Must suck to be you!

I likely will stop wasting my time responding to you. You have no rationality. You have no shame. You have no principles. You have no clue. I would also wager that you have nothing in the way of a relevant resume (match mine against yours anytime you like).

You are the ultimate Low Information voter as proven by the utter lack of substantive arguments in your posts here. Again and again, it is just RINO's and social revolutionaries in GOP-E drag are just soooooo wonderful! And Demonrats are all boogiemen.

When I was at dialysis today, I saw a T-shirt worn by a middle aged black woman patient. It said: "You can't scare me! I've got kids!" And I can confidently tell you that the sissy wing of what used to be the Republican Party can't and won't be scaring my kids either. They were raised right. Take your abject fear of the boogieman and put it where the sun shineth not.

I will not change course and there is absolutely NO REASON why I should. My life is not threatened. Sorry about yours if yours is threatened but that is what you get for voting FOR an amoral/immoral monster like Romney. Such behavior makes you expendable without cost to the conservative movement, Ideas Have Consequences. Read the late Richard Weaver's book to that effect. Do you/can you read books? CONSERVATIVE books? Which ones, if any, do you like and admire? Why? Which do you reject and why? I suspect I should not hold my vreath waiting for your answer with specifics, just more of what Reagan called scrawling your obscenities on the outhouse wall with a grease pencil, but, hey!, surprise me and everyone else.

Read enough books like Ideas Have Consequences and works of Bill Buckley, Bill Rusher, Frank Meyer, Willmoore Kendall, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, Will Herberg, Robert Nozick, Alexander Bickel, Martin Diamond, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, Sir Martin Gilbert, Blessed Fulton J. Sheen, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Hillaire Belloc, Gilbert Keith Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Charles Williams, and so many, many more who devoted their lives to articulating an eloquent and wise vision of which you are quite obviously ignorant and that you therefore reject. But, hey! Prove me wrong about your ignorance.

As C. S. Lewis might have said: You are a man with no chest. You and your candidates lose and lose and lose again and ALWAYS will because you have NOTHING WORTHWHILE to offer. Other than: But, but, but.... we are NOT Demonrats. Not good enough!

It WOULD be nice if the last American driven from Californicate would take your only remaining asset, "wonderful weather" and bring it to us in the upper Midwest where we will put it to better use.

Oh, and spare us the usual intellectually dishonest tactic of folks like you of cherry-picking the massive works of Bill Buckley or the public remarks of Ronaldus Maximus to justify your ideological apostasy and vacantness. When I lived in the Northeast, my wife was employed by Bill Buckley and we attended his Christmas parties in Manhattan and I was Reagan's state chair when he challenged the last feckless wimp "Republican" to be elected before him. "Bold colors, no pale pastels! We won't turn our party over to our opponents in the recent struggle (i.e. Ford)" Address those before you try to pass off Gaylord Parkinson's Law (the so-called 11th Commandment) as though it were Reagan's.

You are not fit to utter his name. AND bear in mind that your boy Romney did not even vote for Reagan, as he revealed in his campaign against Ted the Swimmer. He had not become a "severe conservative" yet and, of course, he never became even a milquetoast "conservative." And neither, apparently have you and those mules like you.

128 posted on 11/05/2015 8:00:26 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

You frighten FAR TOO EASILY. That’s why you vote for trash like Romney.


129 posted on 11/05/2015 8:08:00 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican; Norm Lenhart
Willard is not a baby-killer? Not a gun grabber? Not a promoter of fudgepacking posing as "marriage" complete with perks and tax benefits? Oh, are you hallucinating that he would give a crap about resisting Putin or ISIS or anything like either of them? Wouldn't that distract him from making profit off disposing of the dead babies? So, Mittens is not a Muslim. You probably aren't either. I would not vote for you either and I would not vote for Obozo whom we both know is the worst sort of Muslim. Nonetheless, I would not cast even someone else's ballot for a disgrace like Romney in 2012 or EVER.

AND, if you eagerly voted FOR Romney (and you did or you would not be braying about it here a full three years after he got his inner donkey kicked to death for lack of REPUBLICAN votes), don't you be yakking about anyone else being a baby-killer or gun grabber. Voting FOR Romney puts you in those categories as well. Not voting FOR Romney or FOR Obozo means not having to apologize now or ever.

Rule or Ruin! Now and forever.

130 posted on 11/05/2015 8:18:45 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

McConnell and Haley Barbour and their cronies stole the Mississippi primary for Thad Cockroach. Kentucky? Why not? I guess they believe that, if the people displease them, they are entitled to and may dissolve the people and choose a new people.


131 posted on 11/05/2015 8:23:10 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican; BlackElk; Norm Lenhart
Romney would not have made the decisions Obama has.

I have no reason to believe that Romney would behave any different than Boehner or McConnell, maybe even worse.

A short while ago GA State Attorney General Sam Olens addressed our local county Republican meeting. After a nice little presentation and right before the Q & A he went into a short discourse about how proud he was to have been Romney's state chairman. The room grew cold.

Romney was a disaster. The Party picked the ONLY Republican in the entire country who could not credibly attack Obama on Romney/Obamacare, the #1 issue that gave us our House Majority.

In 1992, George the Elder was warned in New Hampshire by Pat Buchanan's strong 38% showing, a warning to get someone better or to at least hew to the people a bit more. Ignored. Incumbent Bush didn't even GET 38% in the General.

In 2012, with plenty of warning, a battery of underfunded candidates exposed Romney's weaknesses. To no avail. Romney worked dirty behind the scenes like it was D-Day, and then became Caspar Milquetoast when it came to the Obamas.

I understand people who chose Romney as the lesser of two evils. You must understand that a critical mass who will no longer submit our votes to extortion will not. Crying about it won't change that. This means no more Romneys, no more McCains, no more Doles, no more Boehners, no more Cantors. And certainly no more Bushes.

John Ellis Bush did this country and his party a big favor when he announced that he was going to win without the base. It has been going just slightly better than Giuliani deciding he didn't need pro-lifers. John Ellis Bush is learning what abandoning the base means, and we shouldn't let up until he is humiliated in real elections, including Florida, or quits before he embarrasses his entire family further.

For 50 years we conservatives have listened to the now obsolete example of Barry Goldwater as an excuse not to nominate conservatives. We now have Dole, McCain and Romney as counters to that. Those who voted for the lesser of two evils, risking the soul of the Republican Party should just put it behind you. Crying about 2012 or 2008 isn't going to get any votes for the conservative or even a compromise candidate. And only makes discord among us.

You might say that an anti-Romney guy talked first.

That's right. Romney lost. He deserved to lose. If we get any more Romneys, they will lose. Whatever Trump's weaknesses, he has shown that you don't have to go Ford/Rockefeller to expand the conservative/Republican voting pool. Goldwater was 50 years ago, Romney was three.

He and his ilk will not get a whole lot of conservative votes just as surely as a2 + b2 = c2. Arguing with the equation will not change the hypotenuse's mind.
132 posted on 11/05/2015 8:39:33 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana; BlackElk

“And only makes discord among us.”

I have said since the PDS wars, that is their purpose. Divide and conquer is what tanked Palin. It is what elected the Mitch/Jonbons and it is what fragged the Romney primaries.

I wish I never had to say the word Romney again. Or Lesser Evil. I wish I could spend my time promoting a candidate instead of defending conservatism on a conservative website. But it’s not possible because not one day has passes since the 08 election that someone on FR is not out there pushing for the very crap that brought the liberalism upon us.

If we play defense, we lose. Again. Before we ever get to the General. We have it all on record. We all lived through it. It sucks but if the GOPe runs wild, all we can do is fight it until lightning flies. Or stand back and watch helplessly while history repeats.


133 posted on 11/05/2015 8:50:23 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

It hit me tonight that ISIS is the globalists’ army. The MB are their advance men.


134 posted on 11/05/2015 8:53:07 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

Proof ? Evidence ? Facts ? Cites ? Links ?


135 posted on 11/05/2015 9:33:26 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

“Let’s see who will I vote for— a left of center Repulican (not my ideal) or a communist, muslim-sympathizing (or outright Muslim, who knows), baby killing, gun-grabbing America hater.

If I’m Norm I vote for someone who doesn’t have a chance and give the WH to the Commie. Wow, I feel great for screwing America, and I brag about it on FR.”

That sums it up perfectly!

Yeah. Norm thinks we should throw him a parade for being Neville Chamberlain.


136 posted on 11/10/2015 9:43:00 AM PST by diamond6 (Behold this Heart which has so loved men!" Jesus to St. Margaret Mary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: diamond6

{”Yeah. Norm thinks we should throw him a parade for being Neville Chamberlain.”}

If he would quit bragging about it, we could quit getting annoyed by it.
He must have many fine qualities, but logical reasoning isn’t one of them.


137 posted on 11/10/2015 10:07:55 AM PST by Calpublican (Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson