Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm conflicted about this, "her story "evolved" to its current version. How much info was she fed by mama and mama's boy friend? How does a 7 year old remember details about what happened when she was two years old?

On the other hand, perhaps her memory is fine and she's telling the truth. A man's life rides on what the jury decides.

1 posted on 11/03/2015 9:32:39 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58

Funny thing it only happened once. Most sexual predators will continue time after time. Hard to believe it was a one time occurrence, if it is true.


2 posted on 11/03/2015 9:37:08 PM PST by eastforker (The only time you can be satisfied is when your all Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

A seven year old key witness = reasonable doubt.


3 posted on 11/03/2015 9:40:28 PM PST by Jack Straw from Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

I wonder if there’s any physical evidence to corroborate the child’s story. If not, I think I would find it difficult to convict the father. Small children have a tenuous grasp on reality and are very easy to manipulate. A relative with an axe to grind against the accused or even a well-meaning social worker could get a small child to say most anything. I also find it hard to believe that the child has a clear memory of something that supposedly happened when she was two years old.


5 posted on 11/03/2015 9:49:08 PM PST by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Manipulative bitter ex-wife out to destroy her ex-husband; and an out-of-control prosecutor who knows there is no case counting on a jury to make an emotional decision to convict with absolutely no evidence. This shit happens all the time.

Not guilty.


6 posted on 11/03/2015 9:53:07 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

The show me state.


16 posted on 11/04/2015 2:43:47 AM PST by bikerman (2015 new motto--- slugs for thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Remembers from age 2.

No.

Sounds like she has been coached and prompted.

Children can be very susceptible to outside influences.

Memory retention does not happen until maybe age 3 or 4 and those are spotty and, again, susceptible to outside influences.


18 posted on 11/04/2015 4:48:33 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

a seven year old testifying of an ‘evolving’ event that happened when she was two? i’m not privy to all the info, but there sure seems to be enough reasonable doubt to drive a semi through. of course sometimes court decisions are more emotional than factual.


20 posted on 11/04/2015 5:27:02 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

I have some vague memories of some things that happened when I was 3 or 4. Napping with my mom while my older brother was at school; being entertained by my older cousin when I was in my crib sick with scarlet fever; waking up in my crib and looking at my brother’s bed thinking an alligator had eaten him (my first nightmare). But the really vivid memories I have from those ages come only from our old home movies. I suspect implanted memories can be vivid. This one will be tough to sort out.


21 posted on 11/04/2015 7:25:57 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson