Oh, no. If this comes out, I don't know how I'm going to explain it to my dog.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: sparklite2
2 posted on
10/29/2015 2:45:20 PM PDT by
exnavy
(good gun control: two hands, one shot, one kill.)
To: sparklite2
It ain’t me, babe. But I bet there are a crapload of Democrats who are a little concerned now.
3 posted on
10/29/2015 2:45:37 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
I wonder if there is a similar release planned for the membership of Nation of Islam?
5 posted on
10/29/2015 2:46:22 PM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Rick Chollett for President!)
To: sparklite2
Hope they do it! Expose these bigotted turds!
6 posted on
10/29/2015 2:46:29 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(A Free Man! Death before disarmament!)
To: sparklite2
This type of stuff is strictly for the Byrds!
To: sparklite2
“In a press release, Anonymous says it is right for the group to unveil the hoods behind the Ku Klux Klan.”
You would think that a group that calls itself “Anonymous”, that engages in criminal activity, and whose members often wear masks themselves when appearing in public, might think twice about adopting that stance.
9 posted on
10/29/2015 2:47:22 PM PDT by
Boogieman
To: sparklite2
10 posted on
10/29/2015 2:47:37 PM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: sparklite2
Of course, we’ll all be absolutely certain the names they release are genuine, right? There’s no way Anonymous has an agenda or would try to implicate an innocent man.
11 posted on
10/29/2015 2:47:41 PM PDT by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: sparklite2
13 posted on
10/29/2015 2:50:33 PM PDT by
mylife
To: sparklite2
So the KKK has Komputers to hack?
15 posted on
10/29/2015 2:51:08 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans Patr are in rebellion... teach him why)
To: sparklite2
1000 names? That means that at least 900 will be undercover govt. employees.
16 posted on
10/29/2015 2:51:22 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
To: sparklite2
Is there any way we can be sure it’s really anonymous doing it?
20 posted on
10/29/2015 2:52:09 PM PDT by
uncitizen
(Trump: Saying what we are all thinking)
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
The problem is that maybe half of these “KKK members” are probably undercover law enforcement agents. ;-)
To: sparklite2
C'mon, Anonymous.. Tell the truth. You are the U.S. gubmint, aren't you? 0dunga/Lynch/Jeh Johnson are at it again.
Why doesn't Anonymous ever release info on Benghazi, IRS scandal, Twin Peaks, Sandy Hoax or any of the gubmint's operations?
To: sparklite2
I wonder how this would work. If there is a known individual behind “anonymous,” s/he stands to be sued if they tag even one person who’s not a member of the KKK. Someone has to have purchased a website, or incorporated or in some other way identified him or herself as the person behind the “anonymous” name.
34 posted on
10/29/2015 3:01:14 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
37 posted on
10/29/2015 3:05:50 PM PDT by
Daffynition
(*Gun control is a tool to make innocents pay the price for the guilty* W.LaPierre)
To: sparklite2
40 posted on
10/29/2015 3:07:33 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Stupid kills, but not nearly enough!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
