Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2015 10:42:24 PM PDT by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Blue Jays

Hiding in plain sight complete with a sign.
Now that is pretty darn funny, one must say!

2 posted on 10/28/2015 10:52:34 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod

http://www.distraction.gov/downloads/pdfs/Distracted_Driving_2013_Research_note.pdf

Government’s own data:

2010:

5,419,000 crashes total, 30,296 fatal crashes, 2993 due to distracted drivers, 366 fatal crashes involving cell phones.

Of total crashes, chance of being killed in an accident involving a cell phone: 7/1000ths of 1 percent, or, 0.0000675

2011:

Same numbers, 5,338,009 / 29,867 / 3047 / 354

Of total accidents, chance of being killed in an accident involving a cell phone: 7/1000ths of 1 percent, or, 0.0000663

2012

5,615,000 / 31,006 / 3098 / 380

Of total accidents, chances of being killed in an accident involving a cell phone: 7/1000ths of 1 percent, or, 0.0000676

2013

5,687,000 / 30,057 / 2910 / 411

Of total accidents, chances of being killed in an accident involving a cell phone: 7/1000ths of 1 percent, or, 0.0000722

All these odds presume that you were in an accident in any given year. Chance of being killed in an accident involving a cell phone if you aren’t in any accidents in a given year? 0.00000

Pretty consistent numbers year over year.

The government is trying to tell a story with its statistics.


3 posted on 10/28/2015 11:59:36 PM PDT by ziravan (Buck the Establishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod

How about he comes here to Memphis to catch all the cops driving and texting?


13 posted on 10/29/2015 2:32:48 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...
He held a sign that read, "I am not homeless. I am a Montgomery County police officer looking for cell phone texting violations."

I don't think he quite has that whole undercover thing down yet . . .

Maryland "Freak State" DANG!

15 posted on 10/29/2015 2:37:11 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod

I’m more interested in how much he collected. I’ve noticed that people that complain the most about “the homeless” are the same ones that enable them by making their standing (or sitting) out in the breeze worth the rewards.


17 posted on 10/29/2015 3:04:00 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod

I don’t know if this is sad or funny, but quite often when dining out we see a nice young couple that by appearances they look like they are made for each other.

The problem is they do not talk or even give eye contact to the other. Both are glued to their phones texting, the whole meal barely taking time out to eat.

How can you develop a relationship if you ignore your partner?


20 posted on 10/29/2015 5:03:20 AM PDT by redfreedom (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson