Replies

The divide is not “liberals vs conservatives”. It’s globalists vs. Americans.

If we elect an American president for the first time since 1984, we can work out all the other stuff among ourselves. If we elect a globalist, there won’t be enough left of “us” to work out anything.

And all you “global economy” people here - you are no better than the Clintons. Shame on you all.

—Jim Noble

The focus on the "globalist" label, is slightly off target. The "globalist" mentality, which first surfaced as a major factor in American politics, at the time of the League of Nations debate, which our side won, hands down, but on which the internationalist, unfortunately, have never given up; is only one facet of the anti-American movement that is undermining the cultural heritage that almost everyone here at Free Republic supports.

If you focus merely on those business interests, such as those that control what is loosely described as the Republican establishment, you overlook the damage done by all of the domestic programs, movements, agitations, etc., that reflect the war on our culture--and hence sense of community--which has been flourishing in Academia & among its parrots in the mass media, for over two generations.

The "globalist" business interests would not dare be so aggressive, if our public still expected all Americans to behave like they understood the responsibility all of us have, as Americans, to preserve uniquely American interests.

The rush to ship manufacturing overseas, used to be at least tempered by an understanding of social duties to our immediate neighbors and fellow countrymen. But as the war on heritage--on duty to country, to cultural, social & legal continuity--has declined, so have the traditional restraints on acting without responsibility to your fellow countrymen.

The Leftwing immigration policy since 1965 also reflects this tragic decline in a sense of responsibility to the continuity of our people, as a people. We need to reawaken a healthy intolerance for domestic Quislings.