Posted on 10/22/2015 2:42:53 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
How come Congress can't call a spade a spade here and simply state that the REASON Obama, Hillary, Rice, etc., falsely promoted the video as the reason for the attack on Benghazi is to lessen the negative impact of the Benghazi attack on Obama's 2012 re-election bid?
The Benghazi attack occurred just 8 weeks before the 2012 U.S. presidential election. With Team Obama's narrative that "GM is alive and Al Qaeda is dead", isn't it CLEAR that the reason they lied and failed to label the attack as a "terrorist attack" is because they felt this would harm Obama's chances of winning the 2012 election?
Has Obama EVER said "terrorist attack", anyway? I don't believe he has. He prefers to say "act of terror" because this term does NOT denote any type of individual, Muslim or otherwise whereas "terrorist attack" DOES. Obama will NEVER use a term which negatively portrays Muslims in any way.
Well, like I told another freeper, if it comes to it, I’ve only shot guns once, but give me your address, hand me one and I’ll be right besides you.
Live free or die!!!
I have a feeling the Trumpster would call for a revolution if he feels he was cheated.
“0dunga had an election to win and didnt want a terrorist attack to deal with 8 weeks prior to the election. So, Hillary went ahead and pushed the VIDEO LIE to help him out.”
Now we have proof that the so called video didn’t cause the rioting and murder of 4 Americans, Hill’s email to Chelesea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.