Posted on 10/02/2015 7:23:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz
I am increasingly suspicious -- almost convinced -- that these spree-shootings are orchestrated. Let us consider: Only days after Boehner resigns (but stays around through October, able to defy his base) TWO mass shooting events occur within hours of one another: The college in Oregon, and a lesser-publicized Inglis, Florida mass-shooting.
If Obama seemed angry, I suspect it was because the second shooting was so small. Note how the two shootings make a perfect diagonal across the country, symbolically book-ending us with violence.
It's really hard to be the point-man in this controversial subject -- that the mentally-ill and medicated can and are manipulated to commit acts of mass murder for political gain -- but point-man, I shall be. I'll take the catcalls of "conspiracy theorist" and "tin foil hat wearer" and so on. So long as the dialogue is started, I'll take the heat.
It is actually well-known that low-level microwave radiation can cause deleterious mental effects on the brain:
Effect of low level microwave radiation exposure on cognitive function and oxidative stress in rats.
Non-Thermal Effect of Microwave Radiation on Human Brain
Nervous and behavioral effects of microwave radiation in humans.
Some of the effects are irritability, sleeplessness, and bad decision-making skills. In the 1970's, the Soviets were bombarding the American embassy in Moscow with these radiations. We objected strongly, and our cover-story was that there were passive eavesdropping devices in the walls... but from the publicly-available research, we know that there was an additional -- perhaps primary -- concern. That concern was that our personnel's mental acuity was lessened by these radiations.
This microwave effect is something we already know is factual. This research is public. What research is there, classified as secret (or beyond) on manipulating and directing a mentally-ill, medicated individual to perform acts suggested by a handler?
The CIA has had decades of experience in 'handling' people, by an agent, to perform actions that are in the Agency's best interests. The experience is out there.
Before anyone tells me that Obama and his minions would never allow innocents to come to harm in order to advance a gun control agenda, I remind you of Fast and Furious (the ATF gun-running scandal). In this scandal, semi-automatic firearms were allowed to end up in the hands of Mexican drug gangs. Many innocent people died, slain by the firearms made available by Fast and Furious. Obama has shown quite clearly, the ability to promote the death of innocent people so that he can get his precious gun bans.
So you’re saying Obama is using microwaves to work against us or some other far-fetched conspiracy that gets tossed around here?
Don’t be ridiculous. I speak not of conspiracy. I said that.
Are you living under a rock? The fundamental transformation of America is happening all around you.
Obama and his Democrat thugs do not respect the rule of law. They use it as procedural brinkmanship. He is most assuredly working against us. That you suggest he isn’t tells me exactly where you stand.
You already are. :)
I was inclined to give you slack on this comment, but then I read your posting history. You are on the left flank of the Republican party, aren't you?
For the third time: I cite microwave mood alteration, not as the operative mechanism here, but as an example of how external forces can drastically alter behavior.
But feel free to keep mischaracterising my comments. It's what leftists do.
Lol!
The entire premise that these school shootings are orchestrated (through microwaves or whatever) by Obama is ridiculous. Mass shootings have been going on well before Obama came into office.
You are entitled to that opinion. I’m not even convinced myself. I still find it something to put out there, let the reader make his own decisions.
That said: Would you like to address the many leftist-leaning posts I find in your posting history? Would you like some examples?
If you guys want to get me banned for repeatedly questioning a conspiracy theory about mass shootings, please go ahead and try to do so.
If you can’t get me banned for that, please use my history of posts at FreeRepublic (in FULL context of the article and/or comment they respond to, of course) in order to further your case.
I’m not asking to be banned, for what it’s worth. But, if you guys think a banning is needed, good luck with your efforts.
Mr. GG2 and I have always felt the Aurora theatre shooting was a false flag. Notice how all these shootings are always carried out by some nut job on psychotropic drugs. The perfect patsy for the CIA/FBI to glom onto and then push in the right direction. Its definitely a suspicious pattern.
Whoa! Struck a nerve, did we? :)
Wouldn’t ever try to get you banned for questioning a conspiracy theory about mass shootings. Reasonable people can disagree about that, or any number of other things.
Heck, I wouldn’t even try to get you banned for leftist comments!
I might make that information readily available to those who can, however. After all, it is well known that leftist thought is not tolerated here. :)
Aurora looked really messed up. There was no way for this guy to buy all the stuff he used, like high-quality body armor, an AR with all the bells and whistles, and top-line pistols like Glocks. He simply could not afford them, even according to reporting.
Couple that with his shell-shocked look in court, and it makes you go, "Hmmmm."
Have you ever read “The Little Drummer Girl” by John le Carre? It’s been a long time since I read it, but the plot IIRC, is basically about manipulating someone who is mentally vulnerable into planting a bomb.
At any rate, I’m convinced that the Sandy Hook shooting was staged in some way. Either the shooter was provoked or the shooting was faked. There are always loose ends and coincidences, but there were a few red flags for me that fell outside those bounds.
1. The shooter, before going on his rampage, first shot up his hard drive. Why? If I were manipulating someone via email or internet chat rooms, I’d want to destroy the evidence, so I’d have him destroy the hard drive so it couldn’t be recovered. No Hitlery-style “wiping” that might be recoverable.
2. Very strange behavior by the father who gave news conference interviews. Smiling and laughing, then a sudden actor’s mask of “sorrow” when the tv cameras started rolling.
3. Very strange behavior by the guy where the busload of kids ended up. He didn’t call anyone?? WTH?
4. Very strange behavior by the pathologist being interviewed on camera. I think it was in the parking lot shortly after. He was evasive and smiling. Very, very odd.
There were more anomalies, but these are the ones I remember off the top of my head.
Yeh that and multiple reports of a second shooter (his handler) by witnesses. He was never supposed to be taken alive. The shooter went out the door and went away from the building and sat down between two cars so I guess his handler didn’t have time to finish him off before the cops got him.
Questioning a conspiracy theory is not a crime on Free Republic. Question it to your heart’s content.
If I were making the decision, however, I’d boot your ass for this alone:
_________________________________________________________
BuckeyeTexan - If Obama were working against us ...
coop71 - Psssst: he’s not
_______________________________________________________
Lucky for you, I don’t get to make the decision.
Obama is working against us openly and secretly. He doesn’t need to use microwave technology or weather machines or LSD or any other so-called conspiracy.
He is in the most powerful position on the planet. He has a phone and a pen. He does what he wants when he wants with few negative consequences, politically or legally.
He embarked on his own grand adventure to fundamentally transform America and the GOPe are disinclined to acquiesce to our requests.
“Psssst: he’s not” still needs an explanation, eh?
“coop71 to BuckeyeTexan
Working against us how? Because if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings for gun control, it’s most definitely not working.
Psssst: he’s not.”
If you read what I wrote, I asked how Obama is working against us, written with the assumption you were implying ihe was working against us through these mass shootings. With this assumption in hand, I immediately offered the example question of “if it’s by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, it’s most definitely not working”. Then I finished by saying “psssst: he’s not”, implying, “Hey, here’s a sarcastically poised answer to my own question: he’s not working against us by way of government sponsored/controlled mass shootings, so try again”.
If you still want me banned, go for it.
I’d like to see you plainly state that Obama is actively working against conservatives. Aside from that, any explanation you offer is a convenient afterthought.
Your posting history is pretty clear to me. You aren’t here for intellectual discussion and debate with conservatives.
Unfortunately, the moderators aren’t at my beck and call. So, carry on.
How did what you say strike a nerve? Striking a nerve would have elicited a much more dramatic response from me. I’m taking these comments at face value - if you can’t read what I said without assuming I’m a liberal, get me banned. It’ll save all of us a lot of time.
As for posting old, non-related stuff to prove something, go for it! Be sure to post all of my infractions and include each comment I was responding to...you know, to be thorough.
If that doesn’t work, I read that if you throw me into deep water and I float, I’m a liberal and you can have me hanged. If I sink and drown, I’m not a liberal. This might be an easier way to determine my intent here. And way more exciting. My posts are boring.
Obama is definitely working against Conservatives. There’s no question at all about that. None. And just yesterday in a presser, during Q&A he basically admitted this fact. But he’s not doing it through some nefarious plot involving secret plans to control peoples minds.
If you dislike my posting history, please go ahead and post the whole catalog of my offensive, non-debating, non-intellectual comments. And like I said before, make sure you include each and every comment I was responding to. And maybe explain at the end of each one what I did wrong and what I should have written instead. Best of luck with this very tedious project.
And remember: This won’t be a petty, fruitless endeavor if you really, really want to try and prove your belief that you think someone you disagree with, based on some of their comments made over a period of 10 years on the internet, is automatically, by default, a liberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.