[CpnHook]

They would also have recognized the sort to which he referred; those people who will pounce on a trifle to distract from more important points.

Nice try, but you fail as always. These are matters which at the core are legal, involving statutory, case law, and Constitutional issues. So I'm consistently bringing the discussion back to these points.

That you try to mock that as "trifles" simply demonstrates how absurdly incompetent you are on these matters and why you invariably need to create a smokescreen of ad hominem and bail out.

[DiogenesLamp]

Deflection. Your insistence on focusing on the 1982 law as being substantially different from the 1957 law, when they both allowed for the same consequences is an example of you pouncing on a trifle, to the exclusion of the main point.

Hawaiian law permits birth certificates to be issued on the "say so" of others. Ergo, Obama could have a birth certificate created by his Grandmother for a birth that did not actually occur in Hawaii.

Please do try and keep up. Better yet, realize the topic is beyond your comprehension level, and go away.

You are just a childish noise machine.