Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

NO, I was talking about the fact that women who have sex with lots of men are considered sluts and men who have sex with lots of women are considered, certainly not anything as derogatory as sluts, and at best, lucky.

HUGE double standard.


136 posted on 09/19/2015 2:00:28 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
NO, I was talking about the fact that women who have sex with lots of men are considered sluts and men who have sex with lots of women are considered, certainly not anything as derogatory as sluts, and at best, lucky. HUGE double standard.

No, different criteria. Females (not just human females) supply sex and offspring, males supply resources (territory, food, other resources) in exchange.

A male who can get multiple females for sex is a successful male. A female who can get resources from multiple males is a successful female.

A female who gets taken out for dinner, gets males at her beck and call to do her favors, who gets males to serve her in the hope of getting enough in her good graces that she will sleep with them, and yet never delivers any, is the type which corresponds with the male "player" (who gets sex without having to deliver on commitment).

141 posted on 09/19/2015 2:26:11 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

He explained why there is a double-standard.


178 posted on 09/20/2015 9:15:01 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson