Judge Lucy Koh, a Korean American, has made quite a few suspect decision in these cases, starting from specifically requesting that she be allowed to try the cases between Apple and Samsung, a Korean based cellular phone maker. Her decisions have been heavily weighted toward Samsung in the trials.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; altair; ...
Appellate Court rules that Judge Lucy Koh abused her discretion by NOT issuing an injunction against Samsung's sales of cellular phones that a jury found were infringing Apple's three patents last year. A serious question that must be asked is why was that not the case in the previous case where a jury found Samsung infringing SIX patents iPhone in 2012 and the same Judge Lucy Koh declined to issue sales injunctions on the infringing products, as well? Samsung says they will demand a full en banc hearing of the entire court on this current ruling. — PING!
Apple gets win in Appeal in 2014 patent infringement case
Judge Koh exceeded her discretionary powers
by not issuing an injunction of infringing products!
Ping!
The Latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword “ApplePingList” on Freerepublic’s Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
2 posted on
09/18/2015 4:49:54 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Swordmaker
I took Intellectual Property in law school and quickly concluded it wasn’t for me.
To: Swordmaker
This is not the end of the story. Expect en banc review by the Federal Circuit and appeal to SCOTUS.
To: Swordmaker
Keep em coming Swordmaker…
7 posted on
09/18/2015 6:10:31 PM PDT by
tubebender
(Evening news is where they begin with "Good Evening," and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson