Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Altariel

>>“In order to be held criminally liable for his acts, proof would be required that officer Enriquez intentionally left his dogs in a closed hot car in Davie, Fla., in late May. There is no evidence to support this ghoulish proposition,”

I wonder if a civilian would get that benefit of a doubt.


3 posted on 09/14/2015 2:16:14 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bryanw92

“I wonder if a civilian would get that benefit of a doubt.”

No, Civilians have already been CONVICTED of just exactly that, letting their dogs die in hot cars through negligence, here in Texas.


9 posted on 09/14/2015 2:24:36 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Bryanw92
I wonder if a civilian would get that benefit of a doubt.

No.

13 posted on 09/14/2015 2:33:02 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson