Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

I seem to recall that the WTC was only insured for one building. Something about the likelihood of losing both buildings at once. Also, I’d always thought that the WTC was Port Authority property. Is this wrong?


2 posted on 09/11/2015 4:12:34 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

Larry Silverstein took a lease out.....he did not own it.

More liberal nonsense to support the defense of radical islam by insinuating that 9/11 was an inside job.


5 posted on 09/11/2015 4:18:23 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Cruz is so far up Trump's rump that they may need a gay marriage license soon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
Well, there was a long standing controversy.Not that it was insured for only one building. It was that was 9/11 two events or a single event. As a single event using two planes to attack the WTC he would be reimbursed for a single event of a terrorist attack. If the two planes were deemed as separate attacks he would then be covered for both attacks, both buildings.

I can't recall for sure, but in the end I think the ruling was that it was two separate attacks.

14 posted on 09/11/2015 4:34:45 AM PDT by lbryce (OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, Bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson