Good for the guys going after the liberal haters!
Bwhahahaha
What if they identify as women?
The headline is precious.
““My overall impression of this group is that their purpose is to track and bait and relentlessly ask to be invited until they get a ‘no,’ so they can bring a suit,”
Of course——like the gays who want a wedding cake——keep at it until they get turned down
It’s becoming The American Way.
.
“Sadly, most of the cases are abusing the law,”
Then next time craft a law saying that fair treatment is not applicable to white Christian men. The USSC will have a much easier time slapping it down that way.
The folks who cry disparate impact and racism because a housing complex doesn’t have enough black applicants who qualify are crying about a law being abused to get results they don’t like.
They can shove it.
You have to love the logic of these women’s groups. They claim they should have an exemption as female centric groups because they do not cause any harm.
Try and get male centric businesses to claim the same exemption. Didn’t I just hear of a barber shop who wanted to cater to men only that got fined $750 for doing so?
What a mess this has become but this equality thing has come full circle and is now attacking the groups that were complaining about inequality. This is delicious to watch.
The law does not just work for some people and not others.
If sex discrimination is wrong its wrong when anyone does it.
I don’t see how this is going to shut down women in tech like its some kind of inescapable force that will prevent smart women from meeting and networking.
Guys commit the majority of violent crimes. Do we still not prosecute female murderers and attackers?
Loser pays makes a nuisance settlement more rich. Without fee shifting the men here had no real damages, so their case would never have been brought.
Aren't they still using a 1950s law to integrate schools?
Ten, twenty, thirty years ago, women’s rights groups did exactly the same to men’s organizations. In doing so, they established the legal precedents now being used against women only organizations.
In turn, this was based on the evisceration of the idea that there is an unmentioned “right of association” in the constitution. That people had a natural right to associate with those they wanted to associate with, and in normal civilian society, to *not* be forced to associate with those they do not wish to associate with. (Outside of the military, prison, emergencies, etc.)
While the origins of this are assumed to begin with the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the truth is that the end of the right of association was enabled with the 16th Amendment (the income tax), and the 17th Amendment (the direct election of US senators).
Both of these definitively ended the idea that the public are citizens of their individual states, insofar as that the federal government had to go through the individual states to have direct contact with citizens. That is, the states acted as a *buffer* against federal intrusion into our lives. And this was stripped away.
From that point, the “federal beast” was released, wanting involvement in every particular of our lives, always striving to be more intrusive, omnipresent, voyeuristic, and controlling.
And a big part of this was in negating our right of association. That the federal government has the authority to decree who will be our neighbors and our friends. Who we may do business with, and how.
We SHOULD be fighting off the H1B heathens.
As Martin Luther Enterprise once said, I have a dream that one day, women everywhere will judge men by what’s in their character, not their pants.