Government is there to prosecute crimes.... under rules established hundreds of years ago.
Stick with what is authorized, government. Don't over-reach.
Some may get away with it, but that how it plays out.
Better that 10 guilty go free than one be falsely convicted.
/johnny
Great to see you online Johnny. How ya doin'? You're still in my prayers.
Government is there to prosecute crimes.... under rules established hundreds of years ago.
Stick with what is authorized, government. Don't over-reach.
Some may get away with it, but that how it plays out.
Better that 10 guilty go free than one be falsely convicted.
Listen, Johnny,
Your good sense, although welcome here by *most here, is against those other things which government is for. Namely, that none ever successfully take them to task for how they go about doing whatever it is they say they must, unless they (the government) give advance permission to do so when or if the government can get away with that sort of blanket prohibition about talking about, for example; blanket "fill-in-the-blank" cookie cutter arrest warrants.
To even suggest anything else is to make of yourself a *supporter of criminals* of the worst sort.
Congratulations. You are now bumped higher in the watch-list rankings than you were even before.
Is that a copy of the Constitution in your pocket, or are you just some kind of domestic terrorist?
To hear some of (but not all) LE supporters tell it, if they were to use the same reasoning (if one can call it reasoning) which those supporters have used against others here on FR, and apply that to yourself, and to the rest who are resistant to LE attempts to force encryption keys be given over to faceless & nameless LEO's, then you, JRandom, would be a supporter of child molesters.