Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble

The “equal protection” claim is bogus, no one has been denied equal protection of the law.

There is no right to legal recognition of any grouping of persons assembled for any purpose.

The advocates of this novel definition of “marriage” are free to avail themselves of the process prescribed by Kentucky law to change the laws to incorporate this novel description. This in no way inhibits or infringes upon any persons rights of association or their conjugal rights. Again, there is no *right* to legal recognition of any grouping of persons assembled for whatever purpose.

The people of Kentucky have decided that marriage is between man & woman. The federal government has no say in marriage laws, laws which have always been within the purview of the States.

The USSC has no authority to commandeer the legislative process of the States and declare that “same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States” nor is there any such “fundamental right”

There is no 14th Amend “equal protection” issue, the USSC should not have taken the case.


37 posted on 09/05/2015 4:24:01 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
I agree completely that the equal protection claim is bogus, and that Obergefell was wrongly decided. The case should have been dismissed, but not for want of jurisdiction.
39 posted on 09/05/2015 4:33:32 PM PDT by Jim Noble (You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson