Great! Now we need a Governor of any state (name yours) to say, “The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over this case. The decision is therefore null and void in the state of _____ and will not be enforced.”
Sounds OK to me!
Listen, everyone. If you ask the Federal Courts if they have jurisdiction, what the hell else do you expect them to say?
They will say it’s a no-brainer, of course they have it.
But from my reading of the judicial power, I do not see anything that says that.
Period.
[[Great! Now we need a Governor of any state (name yours) to say, “The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over this case. The decision is therefore null and void in the state of _____ and will not be enforced.”]]
They shouldn’t even have to be declaring that- it should be a given. It’s amazing that one unjust illegal ‘law’ has put every state o n the defensive all of a sudden, when it is the SC and the president who should be defending THEIR illegal decisions
THAT is the ticket- it’s like the story of the Emperor’s new clothes. He got away with it as long as no one would step up and say he had no clothes on.
It’s just a big bluff - and as long as state governors, legislatures, etc go along with it the oligarchy keeps it’s power of subjugation. All we need are a few states to say - enough - you have no jurisdiction here, void it and ignore. What should have been done in Roe V. Wade too.
Then let’s just see them try to enforce it!
Great! Now we need a Governor of any state (name yours) to say, “The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over this case. The decision is therefore null and void in the state of _____ and will not be enforced.”
You might want to dig up Democrat George Wallace and ask him how that works out.
Spoiler: not well.