Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: nickcarraway
Bears and cops. Doggie’s worst enemies.
2 posted on
09/03/2015 9:41:29 AM PDT by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: nickcarraway
If Cecil the Lion or Balu the Bear was attacking my dog and I had a gun, I’d shoot them too.
What’s the moral problem here?
3 posted on
09/03/2015 9:42:12 AM PDT by
SeekAndFind
(What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
To: nickcarraway
Stupid law enforced by stupid government ignoramuses.
4 posted on
09/03/2015 9:42:30 AM PDT by
samtheman
(2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/(Cruz or Palin))
To: nickcarraway
Is not your dog, chattel, your possession?
It certainly is if it bites someone...
If you have a calf and a dog in a pasture and a bear
attacks the calf you can shoot it, but not if it
attacks your dog?
Serious disconnect with reality here.
5 posted on
09/03/2015 9:45:59 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: nickcarraway
So if a bear wants to eat your dog, you’ve got to let it happen?
6 posted on
09/03/2015 9:46:22 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: nickcarraway; Joe 6-pack
To: nickcarraway
Well, hell yeah.
Attack one of my animals and you'll get a bullet, I don't care who you are. That goes for bears, bald eagles, or humans.
9 posted on
09/03/2015 9:47:55 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Mahatma Gandhi)
To: nickcarraway
First, You shoot the bear in the course of your dog protecting you from the bear.
Second, if the neighbors weren’t in the line of fire, being “around”, doesn’t indicate they were endangered.
10 posted on
09/03/2015 9:48:14 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
To: nickcarraway
The government never enforce the law...unless it benefits them.
Anyone else would be in jail had they done this.
12 posted on
09/03/2015 9:50:46 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: nickcarraway
He should sue the wildlife eco-nuts for allowing the bear to come into his yard.
14 posted on
09/03/2015 9:51:04 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: nickcarraway
16 posted on
09/03/2015 9:52:20 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: nickcarraway
It’s illegal to kill wildlifeUnless you're the EPA, then have at it for fun and profit!!!!
17 posted on
09/03/2015 9:54:00 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
To: nickcarraway
We dom’t have many bears in Indiana, but one has been spotted going back and forth along the Michigan line. I saw on the news yesterday that it was in some guy’s house. What I don’t understand is why the wildlife authorities don’t come and get the bears if they are being spotted in densely-populated areas.
19 posted on
09/03/2015 9:56:39 AM PDT by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: nickcarraway
I would demand a jury trial
21 posted on
09/03/2015 9:58:50 AM PDT by
Sybeck1
To: nickcarraway
Well, if he had called the police they could have cuffed the bear and taken him to the police station.
To: nickcarraway
The fact that he fired a weapon in a neighborhood with others nearby is what investigators with Colorado Parks and Wildlife say accounts for the third charge he faces, alleging the man was careless in his actions.But if a cop had shot a dog in a neighborhood with people nearby, everything would be hunky-dory, no carelessness at all.
To: nickcarraway
Jury nullification. All he needs is one dog owner. Exhibit A, a large glossy photo of Fido.
25 posted on
09/03/2015 10:00:37 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but comSUrfmunists just ran for office)
To: nickcarraway
Notice the government pigs pile up the charges so they can force him to plead out. In no way did the shooter “possess” wildlife nor did he discharge a firearm carelessly. Once again the lesson here is never speak with government slime without representation. Had a lawyer got to this guy first he would have known enough to only say he feared for HIS personal safety.
To: nickcarraway
This sort of lunacy in law enforcement and even laws, is exactly what will make people avoid following the law. In this case, such law enforcement is not serving individual rights and our good. The rule of law is diminished.
Ayn Rand put it well in Atlas Shrugged, paraphrasing; You make too many laws and then everyone is a criminal.
So if I am already a criminal no matter what I do, and my dog is being killed by a bear, I will shoot the bear. And thus- ‘Shoot, Shovel, and Shuddup’.
27 posted on
09/03/2015 10:03:31 AM PDT by
Wildbill22
(They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
To: nickcarraway
It’s liberal CO, what else do you expect? Kill kids, save wildlife.
30 posted on
09/03/2015 10:05:40 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson