To: squarebarb
Good Lord I had my laugh for this morning at the various interpretations!Appears to be the same thought process that sees animal and other figures in the stars.
22 posted on
08/20/2015 9:01:36 AM PDT by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: ETL
I did always think that Scorpius was an easy one though ...
23 posted on
08/20/2015 9:04:37 AM PDT by
BlueLancer
(Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
To: squarebarb
Re: "Appears to be the same thought process that sees animal and other figures in the stars."--me
...that is, seeing a single "winged monster" in this collection of individual subjects:
I imagine the original condition of the drawing made it hard to make out at first. Because, obviously, seen here above, there should've been no mistaking this for a single figure of any kind.
24 posted on
08/20/2015 9:12:17 AM PDT by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: ETL
.
>> “Appears to be the same thought process that sees animal and other figures in the stars.” <<
.
Actually, no!
Those came from the Word of God.
.
32 posted on
08/20/2015 4:04:07 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson