Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Megyn And Clinton Want to Bring Back Mark Uterus
grasstopsusa.com ^ | 08/11/2015 | Don Feder

Posted on 08/11/2015 8:18:17 PM PDT by massmike

At the Republican presidential debate, moderator and FOX News anchor Megyn Kelly tried to ambush Donald Trump.

After reminding The Donald that he had "called women you don't like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals," Kelly asked the candidate a rhetorical question that was supposed to eviscerate him, "How will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton, who is likely to be the Democratic nominee, that you are part of the war on women?"

For the record, when it comes to insults, Trump is equal opportunity all the way. He's made disparaging remarks about McCain's war record, called Lindsay Graham an "idiot" and a "stiff" and said Rick Perry started wearing glasses to look smarter, "and it just doesn't work." But none of them are whining about it, or saying that Trump is part of a war on establishment Republicans.

The reality-TV star just shrugged off Megyn's attack with, "What I say is what I say" and "I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct."

He should have said: "Megyn, the Republican war on women is a myth concocted by the Democratic party and its poodle media. You want to talk about a war on women? Hillary led the 'bimbo-eruption' squad that destroyed the reputations of women who accused her husband of sexual assault."

The FOX personality grilled several of the candidates on how much their policies would harm women. She asked Scott Walker, "Would you really let a mother die rather than have an abortion?" Megyn, who's really up on women's issues, doesn't know that modern medicine has precluded the possibility of any woman needing an abortion to save her life.

Hillary, the DNC and The New York Times acted on cue. (If you didn't know better, you'd think Megyn's assault was orchestrated.) After noting that Scott Walker and Jeb Bush want to defund Planned Parenthood, which provides "vital preventive care, cancer screenings, breast exams (and) birth control," Madame Secretary warned, "If this feels like a full-on assault on women's health care, that's because it is."

Memo to Democratic candidates: When talking about the nation's largest abortion provider, never use the word "abortion." Instead, like Hillary, refer to Planned Parenthood as "the country's leading provider of reproductive health care" (as 300,000 dead babies a year would attest – if they could). And while we're on the subject, selling the body parts of dead babies, while gloating about the killing you'll make, is vital to providing quality reproductive health care.

When the party of partial-birth abortion rolled out ye olde war on women in 2014, it worked as well as the Gallipoli campaign. In Colorado (which Obama carried twice), incumbent Senator Mark Udall was so obsessed with the alleged Republican threat to so-called reproductive rights, that even the establishment media took to calling him "Mark Uterus." In a race where he scaled the heights of absurdity, claiming his opponent wanted to outlaw birth control, Udall lost to Congressman Cory Gardner, 46% to 54%.

That was also the year poor Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke, described in the press as a "reproductive rights activist," tearfully told a meeting of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee, that she felt "powerless" because the Catholic institution wouldn't pay for her birth control. That she could have chosen a non-Catholic law school wasn't even considered, nor was the fact that at a law school whose tuition and fees are $53,130 a year, students can't afford a package of condoms at CVS.

When Rush Limbaugh called Fluke a bad name – one formerly used for young ladies who are now described as "sexually active" – the president of the United States called her to make sure she wasn't too traumatized. After raising $1 million dollars, the poster child for subsidized contraception lost a Democratic primary for the California state legislature by over 20 points.

The public is less gullible than the editorial staff of The New York Times believes. A September 2014 Rasmussen poll found that a scant 22% of likely voters in the upcoming election believed there really is a political war on women, while 52% said it was campaign rhetoric.

It's the Democratic establishment that's waging a war on women – a war to keep them barren and make the taxpayers foot the bill, a war to keep them in the dark about the nature of the unborn child and the health risks of abortion (including higher rates of breast cancer), and a war to trick them into thinking that there are no consequences from sex outside marriage – mental or physical. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that each year, 19 million new STD infections occur among those 16 to 24 years of age.

The Democratic Party has a vested interest in single women and barren wombs. In 2012, while losing married women, it won single women by 17 points. It wants women unmarried, sexually active and dependent on government for "reproductive health services." Planned Parenthood gets $500 million a year from Washington to make the womb a battlefield where 1.1 million die in this country every year.

That's not the only war Democrats are fighting. There's the war on Christians – whose latest manifestation is the persecution of those who refuse to violate the principles of their faith by providing services for ersatz weddings. School children are subjected to Gender Identity theory, which teaches that male and female are social constructs and we can all choose our gender from a list of 51 options.

Do women have a stake in public safety? Under the slogan "black lives matter," the left has waged a relentless war on law enforcement. Here, the casualties are all too real, like the two Brooklyn cops shot execution-style last December. The murderer said the slayings were in revenge for the deaths of black men in Ferguson, Missouri and New York City. The number of police killed in the line of duty almost doubled between 2013 and 2014 – rising from 27 to 51.

Thanks to Obama and his party opening the floodgates to Muslim "refugees," Sharia law is coming to America – a poll by the Center for Security Policy showed 51% of U.S. Muslims want it – and you know what a blessing that will be for women.

If she's one of the hosts of a Democratic debate, I'm sure Megyn Kelly will subject Hillary to an equally tough interrogation.

"Madame Secretary, what exactly did you mean when you asked a congressional committee investigating Benghazi 'What does it matter now?'" "Mrs. Clinton do you really see no problem in the $25 million you and your husband received in speaking fees since January 2014, much of it from companies and foreign governments whose interests you championed as Secretary of State?"

"Do you think voters should be concerned about the 50,000 times you used your personal e-mail server to conduct State Department business, in direct violation of the law, and what does that suggest about transparency in a future Clinton administration?" and: "Do you really want to maintain federal funding of Planned Parenthood after the release of videos that showed officials chortling about the sale of baby body parts, which you yourself initially called 'disturbing'?"

Megyn will confront the former first lady in this forthright fashion just as soon as Jeb Bush starts talking about murderers and rapists coming across our southern border and Bernie Sanders admits that socialism has been an utter failure wherever it's been tried.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016; markudall; markuterus; trump; uterus

1 posted on 08/11/2015 8:18:17 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

I love Don Feder.


2 posted on 08/11/2015 8:29:08 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Trump should have said “Megyn, Ms. Clinton hasn’t asked me that question yet. You have. And you’re not running. Or are you?”


3 posted on 08/11/2015 8:37:17 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Since you're so much smarter than me, don't waste your time insulting me. I won't understand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

I think he touches on the real problem. The problem was Trump’s answer not Kelly’s question. He failed to mention that Rubio was questioned about supporting a exception for rape and incest and that Jeb was questioned about his support for common core and for being on the board of a foundation that gave millions of dollars to planned parenthood. Too bad those facts don’t play into Kelly and Fox being tools of the liberal establishment. I suppose you want a media that treats Trump like the MSM treats Obama. Frankly I don’t. I want a media that will ask tough question of everyone from all angles. It is too bad that you want the media to be a propaganda tool for Trump


4 posted on 08/11/2015 8:43:07 PM PDT by glabbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glabbe

I didn’t get that from it. I think he thought Trump could have said more. But he was NOT impressed with the question.

Anyway, Don Feder is one of the best thinkers out there. He is a very talented writer. I’ve missed him lately , though. I don’t see his articles posted at his website any more. I guess I have been looking in the wrong places.

Tough questions are for interviews. Debates are supposed to be about seeing how the candidates compare on the issues. Even in an interview, that question was not well researched. It was a cheap shot.


5 posted on 08/11/2015 8:52:31 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Megyn Kelly tried to ambush Donald Trump

Machine Gun Kelly did a pre-meditated AMBUSH 1 of Trump. She unloaded her Marxist meme "war on women" magazine on Trump. He's still standing. She's bleeding out. Any RESPECTABLE "news" organization would clean up the mess.

ESAD FOX

6 posted on 08/11/2015 9:13:45 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

POSOTUS can offer a drink summit and give her a bloody Megyn to smooth things over.


7 posted on 08/11/2015 9:15:25 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Oh yes. Richard Feder's brother.

8 posted on 08/11/2015 9:53:22 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glabbe

There are two lines of questioning, one is character based when relevant during a scandal, the other more presidential are policy based.

Megyn Kelly went into lawyer mode to humiliate a witness in front of a jury on issues not relevant to his choices in terms of people he associates with or policies he chooses.

That he is unartful when he fires or scolds someone is a total BS detail that would only concern the civil servants working under him.


9 posted on 08/11/2015 10:03:23 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Kelly’s question might just as well have been “When did you stop beating your wife?”


10 posted on 08/12/2015 2:16:03 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

...”Megyn Kelly tried to ambush Donald Trump
Machine Gun Kelly did a pre-meditated AMBUSH 1 of Trump. She unloaded her Marxist meme “war on women” magazine on Trump. He’s still standing. She’s bleeding out. Any RESPECTABLE “news” organization would clean up the mess.”...

The “War on Women,” marinates in P.C., and people are sick of all of it. Who props up this stuff? It is not women like myself or my friends. It is women at the top of the feeding chain who have reached the pinnacle of success but still lust for more power, because what they have does not satisfy. What do they have to do to satisfy that lust?..Well, they have to destroy the men they need to complete themselves and their hopes and dreams and they become very angry that they will never be men, no matter how hard they try. When this nation stumps it’s toe for real, Mother Nature will correct the craziness, but until then, we just have to endure..somehow.


11 posted on 08/12/2015 3:15:25 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazzlite

Analysis BUMP! Thanks, jazzlite.


12 posted on 08/12/2015 5:08:26 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson