I think he touches on the real problem. The problem was Trump’s answer not Kelly’s question. He failed to mention that Rubio was questioned about supporting a exception for rape and incest and that Jeb was questioned about his support for common core and for being on the board of a foundation that gave millions of dollars to planned parenthood. Too bad those facts don’t play into Kelly and Fox being tools of the liberal establishment. I suppose you want a media that treats Trump like the MSM treats Obama. Frankly I don’t. I want a media that will ask tough question of everyone from all angles. It is too bad that you want the media to be a propaganda tool for Trump
I didn’t get that from it. I think he thought Trump could have said more. But he was NOT impressed with the question.
Anyway, Don Feder is one of the best thinkers out there. He is a very talented writer. I’ve missed him lately , though. I don’t see his articles posted at his website any more. I guess I have been looking in the wrong places.
Tough questions are for interviews. Debates are supposed to be about seeing how the candidates compare on the issues. Even in an interview, that question was not well researched. It was a cheap shot.
There are two lines of questioning, one is character based when relevant during a scandal, the other more presidential are policy based.
Megyn Kelly went into lawyer mode to humiliate a witness in front of a jury on issues not relevant to his choices in terms of people he associates with or policies he chooses.
That he is unartful when he fires or scolds someone is a total BS detail that would only concern the civil servants working under him.