Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/30/2015 1:41:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Sure. Add water and stir, don’t shake.


2 posted on 07/30/2015 1:42:35 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Theoretically, yes. Practically, no.


3 posted on 07/30/2015 1:46:34 PM PDT by prisoner6 (Unmutual and Disharmonious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Have the Supreme Court declare its “right” to existence, and it will be so.


4 posted on 07/30/2015 1:47:30 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The space station in 2001 A Space Odyssey had the gravity problem solved. This should have been the way the International Space Station should have been designed.

5 posted on 07/30/2015 1:54:35 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

No problem...just spin the space station you are visiting.


6 posted on 07/30/2015 1:54:51 PM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Manned rockets accelerate at roughly 2G for 8 minutes to reach orbit. To do this requires about 6,000,000 pounds of Saturn 5 rocket, most of it discarded/burned during the process.

To SWAG the “160 hours to Jupiter” trip, we’d need something on the order of 7.2 billion pounds of rocket ... and that’s just for a single one-way trip.

I’d compute the mass required (assuming perfect E=mc^2 conversion) for a 1G 100 light year trip, but for the moment I’m fried.

Suffice to observe that space travel, at speeds fitting comfortably into human lifespans, is EXTREMELY expensive.


7 posted on 07/30/2015 2:02:06 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBex8zbDRs


9 posted on 07/30/2015 2:08:48 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I get barbequed every time I mention this, but as Sallah and Indiana Jones said in Raiders: "They're digging in the wrong place!"

Gravity is not a state property. It is a happenstance, merely a result of other processes. Solve those processes (well, one of them) and you have the ability to control a gravitational field. I even developed an experiment to test the hypothesis. Anyone have a billion dollars I can borrow?

13 posted on 07/30/2015 2:20:54 PM PDT by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

What they don’t tell you about rotating rings are things lie vertigo and the Coriolis effect that make them next to worthless.


14 posted on 07/30/2015 2:22:43 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Without mass, you can’t have gravity.

Like the Higgs Boson who walked into church and said you can't have Mass without me! (Bada-bump)

18 posted on 07/30/2015 3:05:59 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Mass or acceleration (spinning works). No other way to create gravity.


23 posted on 07/30/2015 4:12:08 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

An argument has been made that gravity is virtual, not a thing in itself, but an effect caused by the curvature of space by mass.

To start with, under many circumstances, time and space seem to be two dimensions of the same thing. Change one and you change the other. And if you are familiar with Einstein’s two dimensional grid model of space, you know that mass acts upon space by deforming it, also deforming time in the process.

The hard part, much more difficult to conceptualize, is that the grid is actually three dimensional, so bodies with mass deform space all around it, towards it. And this deformation of space and time is such that it seems to do what gravity does, but without the need for gravity.

In any event, this perhaps makes creating “artificial gravity” easier, because instead of manipulating gravity, you manipulate space time like mass does.


24 posted on 07/30/2015 4:25:53 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Gravity has no speed limit, and in space there is no speed limit that we know of.
To accelerate in space at 1g would be a waste of time because if gravity
can be artificially produced speed has no boundaries in space. Light is also
effected by gravity which shows how powerful it is, and constant.

Gravity from one million light years away effects us, so imagine traveling on
a wave of gravity to anywhere at any speed. Watch out for that one speck of
dust at high speeds though, one particle and it's curtains.

27 posted on 07/30/2015 8:00:58 PM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson