You’re the one who made the insulting inference, it’s up to you to either prove your allegation or get off your high horse.
Free speech also includes consequences for obvious falsehoods, which you appear to be good at avoiding by using the type of deflection and weaseling typical of a certain leading democrat..
You inferred the meat has wood fiber, you inferred the fries have wood fiber, and you get all “I didn’t say that” when called on it.
Others have also questioned your statements, and I see you have been equally obtuse with them.
So, when did you stop beating your wife?
Prove it legally. That’s apparently the way MY country works now. Heck, even the Constitution doesn’t matter any more. Frankly, your interpretation means nothing now unless you can bring a case up before a liberal court for my injuring you sensibilities (all the rage nowadays, I hear)
Seems to me you are prone to hysteria and false interpretation.
BTW. Re-consult a dictionary. “Obtuse” wouldn’t be the word I think you were going for. Just guessing but a more appropriate word might have been “evasive,” or perhaps “misleading.”