Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

I do not necessarily view this as a bad thing. The ‘doze “Automatic Updates” were so buggy that they sometimes would BSOD the machine and I began disabling them long ago because of that.

Now, I simply no longer allow any machine running ‘doze internet access so as to eliminate the problem. Since I for the most part run linux I no longer have to worry about such things although I still have clients that do.

If I see a need for an update, I will first copy the machine before allowing any update, then if any problems arise I will restore it and wait for a later and possibly more stable update to become available.

Best way to go, I believe.

Cheers. :)


15 posted on 06/27/2015 9:00:11 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Utilizer
We think much alike. But I suspect we are in the vast minority among those who run Windows.

My dislike of Samsung here is the sneaky nature of their disabling. It smacks too much of the old browser and A/V wars, where software manufacturers would disable each other's installations and take over system defaults.

At the very least, Samsung should have made it clear what they were doing.

17 posted on 06/27/2015 9:59:03 AM PDT by dayglored (Meditate for twenty minutes every day, unless you are too busy, in which case meditate for an hour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson