To: Cringing Negativism Network
3 posted on
06/26/2015 6:24:01 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
("Psychopathia Sexualis, I'm in love with a horse that comes from Dallas" - Lenny Bruce (1958))
To: a fool in paradise
Nice suggestion, but Perot was a third party candidate.
Trump is competing (and competing well) for the candidacy of the GOP.
That is a signicant difference.
To: a fool in paradise
Nah, Donald has to big an ego to run 3rd party knowing he will lose.
6 posted on
06/26/2015 6:28:18 PM PDT by
dforest
To: a fool in paradise
Anything is better than Bush versus Clinton.
9 posted on
06/26/2015 6:38:29 PM PDT by
RC one
(Militarized law enforcement is just a politically correct way of saying martial law enforcement.)
To: a fool in paradise
The reason their was a Perot in the first place was that Bush broke
his promise “read my lips, no new taxes”
And then passed new taxes.
In addition, Perot picked up almost 20% of the dis- satisfied voters
Bush left on the table.
My suggestion. Don’t break promises and don’t leave votes on the
table and you won’t have “another Perot”.
10 posted on
06/26/2015 6:38:54 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
To: a fool in paradise
Perot 2015? Yep, split the Right for Jeb first, then Hillary.
17 posted on
06/26/2015 6:53:34 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson