Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

But all spending bills need to go before the House, so getting both houses of Congress involved on a trade agreement makes sense. If I recall properly, even trade bills must go to the House, so doesn’t this seem appropriate? It’s not a treaty.


84 posted on 06/14/2015 7:14:20 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind
But all spending bills need to go before the House, so getting both houses of Congress involved on a trade agreement makes sense.

Spending bills must ORIGINATE in the house.

This "Bill" originated in the Senate, but in fact it originated in the white house. It is not a "bill" anyway, it is a TREATY.

The president negotiates treaties and is supposed to submit them to the Senate for ratification. Once a treaty is signed by the president, the Senate has no authority to change even one word of it. They must pass it by a 2/3 majority or it is dead.

BTW the Congress doesn't care much for the "origination clause" either.

f I recall properly, even trade bills must go to the House, so doesn’t this seem appropriate? It’s not a treaty.

It's a banana.

90 posted on 06/14/2015 7:22:57 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson