Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Husband catches ‘upskirting’ suspect red-handed in Walmart
WTVR ^ | 06/10/2015 | Joe St. George

Posted on 06/11/2015 9:41:30 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

HENRICO COUNTY, Va. — A photo obtained by WTVR CBS 6 News allegedly showed John Wiggins, 55,  using a cellphone camera to snap photos up a woman’s dress at the Walmart in Short Pump. That picture was taken by the husband of another woman who claimed she was also one of Wiggins’s victims.

Henrico Police arrested Wiggins after he allegedly violated two women by using his smart phone to snap pictures under their skirts on Sunday, May 31. Officers said one victim became very uneasy when he  bumped into her in the middle of the store and pretended to drop something in the store.

upskirtclose

Caught Red-Handed 

The woman whose husband snapped the photo spoke to WTVR CBS 6 reporter Joe St. George on the condition of anonymity Wednesday.

“If it can happen to me, it can happen to you,” she said about the incident.

So how did it happen? The woman said Wiggins dropped a box of pasta on the floor as a distraction – and as an excuse for him to reach down to get closer to the floor and into the perfect spot to snap a pic.

“It started in the shampoo department and that’s when it happened the first time,” she explained. “I just turned the aisle and he looked directly at me and I felt his guilt.”

After the ordeal, the woman said her husband decided to follow Wiggins around Walmart to try to catch him in the act.

That’s when he snapped the photo of a woman in a green and blue striped dress wearing flip-flops reaching for an item in the spice section.  That photo also captured the suspect squatting down to lower what appears to be a cellphone under her dress.

The victim said the incident caused her to change her shopping routine.

(Excerpt) Read more at wtvr.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Hobbies; Local News; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: perv; shortpump; upskirt; walmart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Slings and Arrows; martin_fierro

Short Pump Ping.


21 posted on 06/11/2015 10:00:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

There’s a really fine line and it’s not one that anyone really wants to go to war over.

On the one hand, no, you don’t have any right to privacy in public. People can take your photo on the street and use it for art or editorial purpose, but if they wanted to use it as advertising, they would have to have a signed license.

Street photography has a long history and has provided us with some wonderful shots of daily life.

Nobody can take a photo in public of something that you aren’t displaying, and if you’re displaying yourself in a way that your underwear is visible, then it’s no crime to take a photo of that.

Now going out of the way to see what is normally not visible is certainly creepy, and we have laws for peeping toms, and I don’t think taping a GoPro to your shoe and going on the subway should be something a person should do, but if there are small cameras and public places, if you don’t want your bits photographed, then cover them up.


22 posted on 06/11/2015 10:00:47 AM PDT by arbitrary.squid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
I’m glad this man was arrested, but I’m pretty sure I have heard some of our high courts rule that when you are in public, you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. I’ve heard of at least one case where a peeper was found innocent of violating the law. He should have been kicked in the face.

You may be thinking of a recent case in Massachusetts, where the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overturned an upskirt photographer's conviction under the state's Peeping Tom laws, because the laws were written in such a way that upskirt photos didn't fall within any of the specific provisions. It wasn't necessarily about a reasonable expectation of privacy, it was that the law specifically applied only in certain locations (dressing rooms, people's own houses, etc.) or when someone was nude or "partially nude." It was a bad result (obviously these creeps should be stopped), but probably the right decision under the law.

The Massachusetts legslature and governor fixed the law within a day or two of the court's decision.

23 posted on 06/11/2015 10:02:25 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

I had a HS Coach/History teacher who arranged the desks on three walls facing inward. It was obvious what he was up to so I went to the principal. Of course, the principal did nothing.


24 posted on 06/11/2015 10:36:50 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
Nothing new, only the technology has changed. I had a high school teacher (45 years ago) that used to drop pencils near the desks of the good looking girls so he could get a look see.

Well I guess now I must confess, in junior high we had a really hot German teacher that wore short skirts, us guys were accidently dropping trash all the time so she would pick it up. Funny though, when my daughter was around thirteen and some pervert would start staring lewdly I had no problem confronting them in the middle of a mall. I guess unlike most of us that learn proper and improper behaviour there will always be some that need to have it beaten into them.

25 posted on 06/11/2015 10:37:46 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
sheesh...what happened to the days when the creeps would have little mirrors on the toes of their shoes?
26 posted on 06/11/2015 10:45:46 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (No tagline today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Yes. This crap. Plushies.
People using their phones to be porn stars.

In the past people didnt have extra energy to be bored with. Too busy doing necessary work.


27 posted on 06/11/2015 10:46:14 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
If it can happen to me J-Roc Trailer Park Boys photo: Trailer Park Boys photo_view_big-2-1.jpg it can happen to you.
28 posted on 06/11/2015 11:01:56 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He would have never stood straight up. His camera would have been under heel.


29 posted on 06/11/2015 11:03:32 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I see this has not yet been posted on People of Wal-Mart.


30 posted on 06/11/2015 11:57:42 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

I think this sort of crap is pretty TAME for the People of Walmart.


31 posted on 06/11/2015 12:01:06 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the_individual2014

This is the thinnest woman to ever enter a Walmart!


32 posted on 06/11/2015 12:48:57 PM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Alleged Short Pump upskirter believed to be ‘danger to himself’

Husband, father to teenage daughters, good neighbor for 19 years.

Threw it all away being a perv. What an idiot.

33 posted on 06/11/2015 4:06:04 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Crunch....”Sorry, was that your phone? Didn’t see it there....”


34 posted on 06/11/2015 4:45:40 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson