You denied, in an earlier post to me on this post, what you have now repeatedly proved; re your attitude and impugnations against those whom you feel are opposed to your POV.
And guess what.....the ages of his victims don't compute with your repetitious age postings.
Josh was born in 1988. The ONLY 5 year olds in in that home, in 2003, were two of his brothers, neither of whom has a vagina. The only 8 year old was another brother.
The only girls that are anywhere near those ages, at that time are Jinger, who was born in '93 and Joy-Anna who was born in '97.
How do I know this? Because the birthdays are all listed on articles all over the net.
Since I have NEVER posted anything at all that would lead anyone with more than 3 working brain cells that I was okay with any kind of molestation, I'm calling you, yet again on your reply to me.
The ONLY reason why the ages matter, is because ALL involved were minors and why this shouldn't have been made public; especially a decade plus after the fact.
What's the matter, your idols have feet of clay; dear ?
I’m not sure what your point is. Josh molested the 5 year old when he was 15. According to you, he molested the two who were interviewed when he was 13. So what’s your beef?
As I stated earlier, I’ve not been of the opinion that someone condones child molestation. I mean, because who in their right mind would ever do that?