Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Perspective from Arkansas on Duggar Situation National Media Does Not Know

Posted on 06/10/2015 10:54:02 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Hey guys!

I live near and know the Duggars.

I thought maybe I would provide a little perspective on why this is happening now.

I'll use a timeline as that may be the easiest way to show events.


Fall/November 2014 - Fayetteville Arkansas, a notoriously liberal and hippy community tries to pass a Trans-gender Equality law/ordinance.

The ordinance would have forced businesses and churches to accept gays and trans-genders in their bathrooms and businesses. It was quite a heinous ordinance.

Michelle Duggar began making robo calls against the ordinance. The Duggars used their influence, money and everything they had to stop the ordinance.


By late 2014, early 2015 the Ordinance was repealed by the people. This ENRAGED the gay, hippy, liberal community in Fayetteville and Springdale. The two cities are minutes apart. The Duggars were blamed for the failure of the ordinance.

Soon after, the GAY Police Chief of Springdale, Arkansas, where the Duggars live, announced she would be retiring in a few months. In her statement she said she would not retire before 'she finished up some unfinished business'

The local elections were held and the Sheriff of Washington County and other officials were safely in place. Within a few months .. the GAY police chief illegal releases the Duggar documents.



Late Spring 2015 - The Duggars lose their TV show, Josh is forced to resign, the Duggars are now embarrassed and their name is MUD.

Within 2 WEEKS OF THE DUGGAR CONTROVERSY.. Fayetteville Councilman have now brought the Transgender bathroom/church/business issue back up again. Now that they have the Duggars out of the way.. the ordinance is theirs to pass without interference.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: childsexualabuse; joshduggar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: fatima

weird.


81 posted on 06/10/2015 4:51:01 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Don’t sound normal.


82 posted on 06/10/2015 4:52:13 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

I hear you.


83 posted on 06/10/2015 5:10:53 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Btttt


84 posted on 06/10/2015 5:26:15 PM PDT by wardaddy (Game of Thrones turned ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fatima

Posting in rush never works.Attracted.


85 posted on 06/10/2015 5:35:45 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
Your posts on this thread have added neither new info nor anything even remotely "thoughtful" !

Your opening gambit was a rehash of somewhat mangled "facts", which you have repeated ad nauseam to every single Duggar thread; sometimes many times over on the same thread. Your posts and attitude is laughable and your petulant, haughty superciliousness hystericle.

86 posted on 06/10/2015 5:48:36 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Spell check is your friend.


87 posted on 06/10/2015 6:11:29 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

So are reading comprehension,math, and logic skills; get some.


88 posted on 06/10/2015 6:19:27 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

If Josh was 13 when he molested his 9 year old sister does that somehow make it better for you?

Either way, he was 15 when he molested the 5 year old.


89 posted on 06/10/2015 6:29:22 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
You're consumed by this!

You denied, in an earlier post to me on this post, what you have now repeatedly proved; re your attitude and impugnations against those whom you feel are opposed to your POV.

And guess what.....the ages of his victims don't compute with your repetitious age postings.

Josh was born in 1988. The ONLY 5 year olds in in that home, in 2003, were two of his brothers, neither of whom has a vagina. The only 8 year old was another brother.

The only girls that are anywhere near those ages, at that time are Jinger, who was born in '93 and Joy-Anna who was born in '97.

How do I know this? Because the birthdays are all listed on articles all over the net.

Since I have NEVER posted anything at all that would lead anyone with more than 3 working brain cells that I was okay with any kind of molestation, I'm calling you, yet again on your reply to me.

The ONLY reason why the ages matter, is because ALL involved were minors and why this shouldn't have been made public; especially a decade plus after the fact.

What's the matter, your idols have feet of clay; dear ?

90 posted on 06/10/2015 6:56:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I’m not sure what your point is. Josh molested the 5 year old when he was 15. According to you, he molested the two who were interviewed when he was 13. So what’s your beef?


91 posted on 06/10/2015 7:25:42 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

As I stated earlier, I’ve not been of the opinion that someone condones child molestation. I mean, because who in their right mind would ever do that?


92 posted on 06/10/2015 7:28:41 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
What do you care how old he was? A 15 year old is still a minor and none of this should have been made public! That's my point and one which actually has something to do with this thread's topic; unlike your posts.

I posted the simple fact about the ages of the siblings. You're still having a terrible time with reading comprehension I see.

93 posted on 06/10/2015 7:34:37 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
Then explain your hostile, supercilious treatment of other posters, me included, who are not calling for terrible things to happen to everyone in this family, whom, at one time, as you yourself have stated on this thread, you were once a big fan of!

You haven't yet posted one single thing about the topic of this thread ! Why is that?

94 posted on 06/10/2015 7:39:53 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Ok if one sister was 4 and her brother was 15, that’s just worse.


95 posted on 06/10/2015 7:40:53 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You make no sense and just keep repeating the same untrue things over and over again. Is that just how you roll? Because I’m not interested in tired old lies.


96 posted on 06/10/2015 7:44:10 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

He was 18 when the report was made.


97 posted on 06/10/2015 7:45:15 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
PROJECTION !

Please, please, please follow your own advice, since you need it very badly; not I !

Oh yes you most certainly ARE interested in tired old lies...it's what you've been posting since this Duggar stuff all began; dear

98 posted on 06/10/2015 8:09:30 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl
His sisters were all minors back then and none of this was in the news.

Tired old boring post; dear. How many more times are you going to post that?

What has ANYTHING that you have posted to this thread had ANYTHING at all to do with the topic at hand?

99 posted on 06/10/2015 8:12:53 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Perhaps you missed in while you were lying about something I actually never said.

"I think it was probably illegal for the records to be released and if it is found to be the case that it was illegal, I hope they have some recourse there."

100 posted on 06/10/2015 8:46:54 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Hey! That reminds me of a song.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson