Posted on 06/05/2015 8:12:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
Agree 100%!
“I believe that this is just another BS study and this is becoming the Friday silly thread.”
Pretty much. Crazy people are more likely to let the litter box stay uncleaned too long and will have higher rates of this infection.
The vast majority of schizophrenics or others don’t have this infection.
:-)
Thx
Well we do know beyond a shadow of a doubt the rodent connection to the Hantavirus, so I too prefer cats.
Note the look that the cat is giving to the blonde. The cat is thinking 'what the @@@@ were you thinking doing this to me.'
In the optimal cat-rodent cycle of the protozoa, the rodent eats infected cat feces, then the protozoa re-trains the rodent’s mind, to be attracted to the smell of cat urine, so it will be eaten by a cat. This is because the protozoa can only reproduce in the gut of a cat.
In the rodent’s brain, when the protozoa detects chemicals associated with fear in the blood, it releases an enzyme, that makes the cat’s brain secrete dopamine (the pleasure chemical), and GABA (the sleeping and wakefulness chemical).
So the rodent enters a drowsy and pleasant (even sexually pleasant) state of mind when it senses what *should* terrify it. In the case of rodents, cat urine should strongly repel it, but it is re-trained to be attracted to it.
Now, the scary part. This neurochemical system is not substantially different between rodents and humans.
So, if it was an exact extrapolation, things that people should be terrified of, they should over time become attracted to.
Horror movies? High risk sports? al-Qaeda? What *should* frighten people?
Liberty, It terrifies them.................
Luckily cats don’t have kids, They have kittens.
Goats have kids
Thanks! Exactly how long did that take you to post?
Bross and Gibson reported in 1970, that the exposure to pets could be a factor of the development of leukemia. They discovered the increase risk of leukemia among children exposed to sick cats to two-folds.[30] This was also confirmed by Petridou et al. (1997) in Greece. However, Swenson and colleagues proved to be exactly opposite.[31] The concern that pets may be associated with childhood leukemia arose when oncogenic viruses such as Feline Leukemia Virus (FELV) were discovered in animals.[30][32]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371935/
Might explain voting for Democrats.
The Russian study I mentioned included the description you posted. Thanks
As far as I am concerned they can file this with all the other scare of the week studies. What’s next a causal relationship between dogs and autism? I’m tired of the hype studies, how many times has coffee flipped from good to bad, now it’s eggs that are no longer bad and the whole cholesterol industry is being turned on it’s ear. If there is money involved there will always be a study proving something.
Note: this topic is from . Thanks Red Badger.
Bow down to your Feline Masters!!!
I'd be surprised if the journals aren't *littered* with this kind of research.
I think that when cooking Chinese food the cat strips should be cooked well done. It’s the only way to be sure.
Fun read.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
