Another Dem talking point.
I said earlier that if there was ANY substance to this, it would have came out last year. Also, Holder would have went after Walker and charged him then.
WEDC Ping.
I appreciate that you’ve found a recent article on this.
I will follow it, but it may not be the serious issue that you’ve made it out to be. And this statement:
“...the timing of this would be politically motivated to inflict the most damage, especially if Walker is on the Republican ticket...”
will not happen. Such an attack would only focus attention on the much much larger and far more serious Clinton Cash issue.
All we know now is that Walker was the head of a group that made a bad loan. The implication that taxpayer money was laundered to Walker campaign donations is a possibility, but is a long way from being a fact.
The fact the loans weren’t paid back by the end of the year isn’t known to be an issue.
The terms of the loans weren’t disclosed in any of the news articles. They might not even be known.
Apparently, the real issue is that there were 8M in loans dispensed without good documentation. No one has documented where the money is, is in back in the fund? Is it back out on additional loans?
The 8M might not even be missing.
The miss-management of this office though is bad for Walker because as the chair..he has to take responsibility for these documentation errors.
“Walker’s WEDC”—what’s this thing?