To: rickmichaels
Not a credible discussion without reference to the fact that circumcision lessens risk for a number of disorders, not the least of which, HIV/AIDS.
It could assert that this is not a significant factor.
But simply to disregard it, is not credible.
To: CharlesOConnell
Not a credible discussion without reference to the fact that circumcision lessens risk for a number of disorders, not the least of which, HIV/AIDS. And that FGM has no corresponding health benefits.
To: CharlesOConnell
Don’t forget that urinary tract infections are almost nonexistent in circumcised males. We wouldn’t want to deprive them.
5 posted on
05/26/2015 8:57:58 AM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: CharlesOConnell
“circumcision lessens risk for a number of disorders”
“Disorders”? Please list!
“...lessens risk”? How so?
31 posted on
05/26/2015 9:20:42 AM PDT by
equaviator
(There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
To: CharlesOConnell
38 posted on
05/26/2015 9:34:09 AM PDT by
Roos_Girl
(The world is full of educated derelicts. - Calvin Coolidge)
To: CharlesOConnell
As you said: Female circumcision has no medical purpose or benefit whatsoever.
Circumcision does. How much benefit is something that can be debated, but it does have some.
95 posted on
05/26/2015 12:55:05 PM PDT by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson