Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

I didn’t know the Supreme Court made that decision three years ago. I guess life with the possibility of parole after 20 years might be reasonable. But it might not sound reasonable to the family of the dead person,


2 posted on 05/25/2015 10:04:18 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dp0622

If he is going to go free, couldn’t they make him give up the name of the killers?


3 posted on 05/25/2015 10:05:53 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622

I find it hard for people to feel there will be true justice in the sentences if this occurs.

It is completely stupid for anything to be based on age once the person is in their teenage years. They’ve been around long enough. To be able to get a break for murder because they’re under a certain age is ridiculous. And I say “murder” as them having intent to kill someone, either as THE ACT of lawbreaking, or unintentionally like trying to get away from some other crime, and they murder someone trying to stop them.


6 posted on 05/25/2015 10:41:59 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson