Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Tests Electromagnetic Catapult on CVN 78
Product Design and Development ^ | 5/19/2015 | PEO Carriers Public Affairs

Posted on 05/20/2015 9:33:27 AM PDT by Rio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Replacement for steam catapults, if it works well.
1 posted on 05/20/2015 9:33:27 AM PDT by Rio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rio

bet it sends the old school compass crazy


2 posted on 05/20/2015 9:36:24 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

They will most likely get this right, but steam....is awfully reliable....and when you apply it, it has torque right f’in now.


3 posted on 05/20/2015 9:36:53 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio


4 posted on 05/20/2015 9:39:04 AM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio
Having come from the days of steam catapults, electromagnetic should be a lot smoother. The heavy shots can definitely rattle your gourd

Not sure if I would want to sleep in a stateroom next to a cat track with that many trons running through it.

5 posted on 05/20/2015 9:39:14 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Sort of rail gun for airplanes?


6 posted on 05/20/2015 9:42:14 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Cool concept. basically a rail gun. Should allow for custom “tuning” the launch cycle for each aircraft type / weight.


7 posted on 05/20/2015 9:44:28 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Amen regarding the reliability of steam aircraft launch.
Also, we need to bear in mind the repercussions if a hostile EMP takes out essential electronic and electrical systems, as the US Navy found out last year when a Russian plane electronically disabled one of our ships.
Imagine a carrier not being able to launch any of its fixed wing aircraft because of an EMP disabled one of its under-shielded electronic / electrical command and control systems?...


8 posted on 05/20/2015 9:44:48 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
They will most likely get this right, but steam....is awfully reliable....and when you apply it, it has torque right f’in now.

Steam shots used to be full charge, sort of ON or OFF. The initial load was crazy high, and put a lot of stress on everything. Then they moved to progressive catapults that increased the pressure down the stroke. This resulted in the same end speed without the high initial forces.

The electric catapults will also be progressive, increasing force down the stroke.

Not all the old catapults were gone when I started out, and those old ones were really a shot in the pants.

9 posted on 05/20/2015 9:46:52 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

What d'ya mean?
10 posted on 05/20/2015 9:47:47 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind, but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rio

I am waiting for them to rename the Ford the Soetoro.


11 posted on 05/20/2015 9:55:10 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

“Imagine a carrier not being able to launch ...because of an EMP disable”

Yeah, that would be a grim scenario, though most likely, the steam catapult has numerous electronic controls and position interlock doohickeys that would be equally disabled..? I have seen that mechanism on the Stennis; as a tourist, not in the svce. It’s primitive in its way, but there’s no arguing with it if it’s armed and they let it go.


12 posted on 05/20/2015 9:55:16 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Would be interesting to see which superheroes could survive a direct hit from that.


13 posted on 05/20/2015 9:57:13 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
"as the US Navy found out last year when a Russian plane electronically disabled one of our ships."

Because the Russians said they did????


14 posted on 05/20/2015 9:59:19 AM PDT by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

The new magnetic catapults take up a lot less room inside the ship than the steam systems use. I think that’s primary motivating factor.


15 posted on 05/20/2015 10:01:20 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

Is that a true truth? The piston plus track didn’t seem like it took up much more room than the track itself, which I assume would be similar; and the pipes carrying the steam are pretty much there anyway. Meanwhile, the control center for the EM launch would be decidedly non trivial.


16 posted on 05/20/2015 10:05:17 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
The new magnetic catapults take up a lot less room inside the ship than the steam systems use. I think that’s primary motivating factor.

-Less maintenance
-No chance of a bad/weak Cat shot

17 posted on 05/20/2015 10:06:04 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
"Also, we need to bear in mind the repercussions if a hostile EMP takes out essential electronic and electrical systems, as the US Navy found out last year when a Russian plane electronically disabled one of our ships."

Reference? Link?

18 posted on 05/20/2015 10:14:30 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Save Western Civilization. Embrace the new Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

Now the bad news. The EMALS cannot be used to launch tactical aircraft fitted with external fuel tanks. Too much shear force. This is a serious problem that, until solved, will eliminate many longer distance tac flights of fighters and attack aircraft.


19 posted on 05/20/2015 10:15:27 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit; Chode

Gotta be sure to check anybody near the EMALS for any metal plates, etc in the Body. It’s no good waking up to your roomie stuck to the wall or ceiling. (Think Monty Python cats)


20 posted on 05/20/2015 10:20:14 AM PDT by mabarker1 (congress, The Opposite of Progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson