Posted on 05/11/2015 9:08:35 PM PDT by nickcarraway
If the American Dream is defined as upward mobility, than Contra Costa County is one of the few places in California where it is alive and well. But if you were born in a low-income family in San Francisco, your chances of being better off when you grow up is much less. If you were born poor in Los Angeles, the chances of living the American Dream is slim to none.
Researchers for The Equality of Opportunity Project asked Is America the Land of Opportunity? In a series of studies they examined Americas largest counties and metropolitan areas to determine a childs chances of breaking the cycle of poverty. The Bay Area was one of the worst places with the exception of Contra Costa County which ranks at #5, and San Mateo County ranked at #15. San Francisco ranks #34 on the list and Los Angeles is way down at #82.
According to the study, a poor child in Contra Costa County is more likely to go to college and earn more by the time he or she reaches age 26.
Overall, researchers found that areas with greater upward mobility tend to have five characteristics.
Less segregation
Less income inequality
Better schools
Greater social capital
More stable families
The counties in America with the worst upward mobility were concentrated mostly in southern states: Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Virginia, Tennessee, Missouri, North and South Carolina The study also found that contrary to popular perception, economic mobility has not changed much over time, and is consistantly lower in the United States than in most developed countries.
Politically incorrect to state but the fact is that the majority of Hispanics immigrants are not assimilating into American culture. Second and third generation Hispanics speak English well but statistically don’t even come close to the educational and economic achievements of Asian, South Asian and most other immigrant groups.

And then there's Oaktown (Alameda County)
LOL
Glad that the article wastes no time in pointing out the true causes for these differing outcomes! So, I guess that the answer would be to bus in more minorities and "up" the income tax, right? (Or would that, paradoxically, only exacerbate the problem?)
HINT: Could it be that these "five characteristics" are not the CAUSES but rather actually the RESULTS of some deeper, underlying phenomenon? ("Post hoc, ergo propter hoc" Fallacy)
Regards,
Yep, just more MSM tripe. They don’t get it.
So everything leftist hurts kids. Sounds correct.
I wonder if they measured ambition and motivation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.