Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
>>It is Judah that rejected him, not “The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.”<<

Did Christ come to be King of only the house of Judah?

>>The evangelism recorded in the NT is almost totally of the dispersed, gentile House of Israel.<<

Romans 11:25 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery-- so that you will not be wise in your own estimation-- that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;

Romans 11:11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.

Why deny what scripture clearly states editor? It clearly indicates a distinction between the Israelites and the Gentiles. And yes, I understand that the Hebrew and Greek word translated Gentile can also be used for the people of Israel. But the distinction is clearly made when non Israelite people/nations are being spoken of.

>>He told you that in Matthew 15:24, but you choose not to believe him.<<

I've already addressed that and showed scripture to back up my claim.

>>That will be for you to explain when you stand at the Great White Throne with the rest of the condemned.<<

Come on editor. Stop with the playing God and the personal insults against fellow freepers. It's a losing preposition I can assure you.

268 posted on 05/10/2015 3:52:31 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

.
>> “Did Christ come to be King of only the house of Judah?” <<

.
He hasn’t come to be king yet.

When he does, he will bring “The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel” back with him. They are the people he came to save the first time, and he will be successful at the Day of Trumpets.

Citing the result of Greek mis-translations based in the same lack of understanding that plagues your every post will prove absolutely nothing.

Scripture is mainly Tanakh, and it states solidly that he would come to save only the people for his name and those that sojourned with them.

Your wild interpretations make the Bible a book of contradictions.

Little that you post ever has any backing in scripture; its all in your imagination.

You seem to exist to promote Satan’s pre-trib fool’s party, and lead as many astray as you can.
.


269 posted on 05/10/2015 4:11:30 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear
>>The evangelism recorded in the NT is almost totally of the dispersed, gentile House of Israel.<<

The Jews had Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them...


Luke 16:29

291 posted on 05/11/2015 3:36:17 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson