.
>> “Jesus did come to the Israelites but they rejected Him.” <<
.
That is just your total lack of understanding of all scripture.
It is Judah that rejected him, not “The Lost Sheep of The House of Israel.”
The evangelism recorded in the NT is almost totally of the dispersed, gentile House of Israel.
He told you that in Matthew 15:24, but you choose not to believe him. That will be for you to explain when you stand at the Great White Throne with the rest of the condemned.
The very gentile “House of Israel” are the “other sheep.”
.
Did Christ come to be King of only the house of Judah?
>>The evangelism recorded in the NT is almost totally of the dispersed, gentile House of Israel.<<
Romans 11:25 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery-- so that you will not be wise in your own estimation-- that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in;
Romans 11:11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.
Why deny what scripture clearly states editor? It clearly indicates a distinction between the Israelites and the Gentiles. And yes, I understand that the Hebrew and Greek word translated Gentile can also be used for the people of Israel. But the distinction is clearly made when non Israelite people/nations are being spoken of.
>>He told you that in Matthew 15:24, but you choose not to believe him.<<
I've already addressed that and showed scripture to back up my claim.
>>That will be for you to explain when you stand at the Great White Throne with the rest of the condemned.<<
Come on editor. Stop with the playing God and the personal insults against fellow freepers. It's a losing preposition I can assure you.