To: Usagi_yo
...the Baltimore rioters who some news reports described as “protestors [SIC].” The label falsely flatters the thugs and hooligans Exactly. I am so sick of hearing most reporters refer to these a--holes as "protesters".
2 posted on
04/30/2015 11:31:03 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: WayneS
Well yea, when I said I’m biased towards the protesters in a different thread on an ancillary topic I was accused of being biases towards the looters and thugs.
I hope you read the whole article because it discusses multiple lawsuits and million dollar settlements from ‘rough rides’.
4 posted on
04/30/2015 11:35:09 AM PDT by
Usagi_yo
(Give me liberty or give me a cash settlement.)
To: WayneS
I Don't Think They were referred to as Protestors back in the 1960's
6 posted on
04/30/2015 11:37:09 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: WayneS
Oh, haven’t you heard? Even “protests” has been watered down to “rallies”...so, the people are not even protestors anymore, they’re basically cheerleaders now.
15 posted on
05/01/2015 12:31:37 PM PDT by
uncitizen
(I'm Ready for Teddy!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
