Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/19/2015 11:46:44 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

“Camelot, Camelot, Camelot, it’s only a model”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3dZl3yfGpc


2 posted on 03/19/2015 11:50:17 AM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Oh no a DENIER. His career is over.

3 posted on 03/19/2015 11:51:38 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
You cannot be serial!!


5 posted on 03/19/2015 11:58:53 AM PDT by headless_thompson_gunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

7 posted on 03/19/2015 12:10:45 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
Do any of these model factor biomass?... i.e. plants and animals... plants consume breath Co2 and exhale O2.. animals the reverse.. consume breath O2 and exhale Co2...i could see a feed back loop here..increase Co2 and a hotter greenhouse env would increase plant live ..that would then consuming and removing Co2... and removing any greenhouse effect... make me wonder if the earth biomase is a factor in the long term cycling's of earth between hot periods and ice ages
8 posted on 03/19/2015 12:13:01 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
100% of Global Warming Models were WRONG:


9 posted on 03/19/2015 12:15:37 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
“The billion-dollar climate models that have so profitably predicted Thermageddon are hopelessly wrong,” Monckton said.

“We said the models were wrong because they were using a rogue equation borrowed from electronic circuitry and bolted on to the climate, where it does not fit. That equation, and that alone, leads the modelers erroneously to triple the small and harmless 1 Cº global warming we should expect from a doubling of CO2 in the air,” he wrote.

“Our irreducibly simple climate model does not replace more complex models, but it does expose major errors and exaggeration in those models, such as the over-emphasis on positive or amplifying temperature feedbacks,” Monckton explained.

“Take away the erroneous assumption that strongly net-positive feedback triples the rate of manmade global warming and the imagined climate crisis vanishes.”

10 posted on 03/19/2015 12:17:26 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Computer Models Used by U.N. Overstate Global Warming

Models were made by people trying to make a Buck off of us ,don’t forget Obama and Clinton promised the UN $100 Billion a year to fight Global Warming


11 posted on 03/19/2015 12:41:10 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Another scientist in need of “punishing”!


13 posted on 03/19/2015 1:11:25 PM PDT by vpintheak (Call the left what they are - regressive control-freaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ExSoldier

Ping.


16 posted on 03/19/2015 2:19:04 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson