Skip to comments.
Settled Science Scam
Forbes ^
| 3/11/2015
| Steve Moore
Posted on 03/12/2015 1:32:30 PM PDT by tbw2
Climate change isn't settled science, and National Geographic calling it such isn't science.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climateliars; globalwarming
1
posted on
03/12/2015 1:32:30 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: tbw2
2
posted on
03/12/2015 1:35:48 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: tbw2
Sharknado is on its third iteration. It is settled.
3
posted on
03/12/2015 1:38:40 PM PDT
by
gasport
(Immigration reform means arriving in air-conditioned comfort.)
To: tbw2
At one time the Flat Earth theory was settled science. At another time the planets revolving around the Earth was settled science. Luckily some real scientists decided the science was not settled. Facts are that we have small icebergs beaching at Cape Cod, have recently broke the world record for most snowfall in 24 hours, have near record ice cover in the Great Lakes for two winters and here in Texas we have recently had cold fronts coming up from Mexico. Nothing is ever settled on Planet Ape.
4
posted on
03/12/2015 1:53:25 PM PDT
by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way. Was)
To: tbw2
True science is never settled. It is always open to new discoveries, inquiry, curiosity and even refutation of existing hypotheses.
The term "settled science" is a fabrication by persons with a legalistic mind set. The great scientists were the ones who upset the existing theories by proposing new ones based upon new data or deeper insight.
5
posted on
03/12/2015 2:22:32 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: justa-hairyape
Lawyers have “settled law”. Scientists have theories and hypotheses which are always subject to analysis, criticism and even profound disagreements.
6
posted on
03/12/2015 2:28:30 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: justa-hairyape
Yes, but the polar bears....
7
posted on
03/12/2015 2:54:55 PM PDT
by
petercooper
("How To Destroy The Country In 6 Short Years" by Barack Obama & the Democrats)
To: tbw2
Yeah, I’m done with National Geographic. Every issue has multiple mentions of global warming. I didn’t even open last month’s issue. I just threw it straight in the trash.
8
posted on
03/12/2015 3:12:31 PM PDT
by
762X51
To: tbw2
National Geographic --- further proof that liberalism destroys EVERYTHING it controls.
My subscription lapsed years ago.
9
posted on
03/12/2015 3:25:16 PM PDT
by
Amagi
(Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
To: reg45
10
posted on
03/12/2015 3:55:42 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: reg45
And the measurement techniques and computer models are imprecise with error. Sometimes gross error.
11
posted on
03/12/2015 3:56:56 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
To: gasport
No scientist is addressing the Global Gravity increase, look at Hillary, she has settled quite a bit over the years. I feel a bit wider myself.
Surely this is settled science.
To: dhs12345
One of the advantages of being educated as a scientist is that I have actually done science.
13
posted on
03/12/2015 7:58:48 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
To: tbw2
.
National Geographic has never bothered with Science; they’ve always been a propaganda horn.
.
14
posted on
03/12/2015 8:01:41 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: tbw2
Yeah, but they used to print all those pictures of bare-breasted natives.....
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
