Why would she want her daughter to be gay, if homosexuality is innate?
Either she’s born gay or she’s not - right? And if she’s not born gay, then isn’t wanting her to be gay a denial of her sexual identity?
And so, shouldn’t she be sued for everything she has and forced out into the street, like gays are doing to that flower seller?
Because these people are supposed to do no wrong. Their line of “innate” applies to the little people, but not to them. Look up the stories on FR, and you’ll find a handful of kids who got exposed to some pretty racy material and left vulnerable to sexual abuse, yet no one was willing to believe them because their “parents” were same-sex couples. They are more equal than everyone else. It’s the ultimate trump card nowadays.