It isn't censorship; TED is protecting their brand. If they're seen giving a voice to a quack, what's next? Alien abduction and moon landing hoax experts? Serious people would stop watching.
“It isn’t censorship; TED is protecting their brand. If they’re seen giving a voice to a quack, what’s next? Alien abduction and moon landing hoax experts? Serious people would stop watching.”
TED, to my mind, let’s plenty quacks have a voice. Maybe not as whacky as Sheldrake.
They are welcome to set standards as long as the standards are applied fairly and consistently.