please do enlighten everybody and explain to us all why the following 5 points are ‘cartoon understanding’ of science (and by the way- the mathematical and chemical impossibilities of evolution were decided on by the world’s top evolution scientists at a scientific symposium to discuss the viability of macroevolution- that is not a ‘Christian’ conclusion- although we do agree with it because the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of macroevolution being impossible, but since you have such a profound understanding of the ‘science of evolution’ I’m sure you can set us all straight by explaining why evolution isn’t impossible regarding those 5 issues-
And I’d like you explanation for why miller’s argument about irreducible complexity arising naturally is true despite his silly argument which only served to prove why an intelligent designer was needed (too bad he wasn’t birght enough to recognize it though)
Just out of curiosity, was it the Wistar symposium you were referring to?